AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

VS
Performance
Radeon Pro 5607% better
5,3055% of 104,598
Quadro K4100M
4,9575% of 104,598

The Radeon Pro 560 has 7% better performance than the Quadro K4100M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon Pro 560
No data available
Quadro K4100M
3.312% of 161.45

The Quadro K4100M has 2% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.

Shop Radeon Pro 560
Shop Quadro K4100M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon Pro 560 GPU

The AMD Radeon Pro 560 is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2017. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Polaris 21) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Pro 560 has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,270 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 81.28 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Pro 560 includes 1,024 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 907 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Pro 560 has the 242nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.07% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA Quadro K4100M GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro K4100M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q3 2013 with a MSRP of $1,499. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK104) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The K4100M has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 800 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 102.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The K4100M includes 1,152 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 706 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 706 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 96 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 100 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance & Value

The K4100M has the 249th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 4.74% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 4,957 score and $1,499 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 3.31. This is the 103rd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon Pro 560Quadro K4100M
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureGCN 4.0Kepler
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2017Q3 2013
Launch Price (MSRP)--$1,499
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Radeon Pro 560Quadro K4100M
Low - 720p
--
178 FPS
Medium - 768p
--
115 FPS
High - 768p
--
101 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
37 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro 560 orQuadro K4100M
GPUFrames Per Second
Our database does not have enough FPS data to compare with other GPUs.

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro 560 orQuadro K4100M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon Pro 5607% better
5,3055% of 104,598
Quadro K4100M
4,9575% of 104,598

The Radeon Pro 560 has 7% better performance than the Quadro K4100M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon Pro 560 is ranked 242nd with a score of 5,305, and the Quadro K4100M is ranked 249th with a score of 4,957.

Performance per dollar
Radeon Pro 560
No data available
Quadro K4100M
3.312% of 161.45

The Quadro K4100M has 5% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

Quadro K4100M's 3.31 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro 560 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon Pro 4555,388+2%
FirePro M61005,369+1%
Quadro M12005,310+0%
Radeon Pro 5605,305
GeForce GTX 960M5,278-1%
Radeon Pro 5555,185-2%
Quadro M2000M5,143-3%
Quadro K4100M4,957-7%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro 560 orQuadro K4100M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon Pro 560Quadro K4100M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1,376
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
1,519
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
23,105
24,685
(+6.84%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
3,892
(+6.51%)
3,654
3DMark 11 Performance Score
5,718
(+8.72%)
5,259.5
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
86.8
115
(+32.49%)
PassMark G3D Mark
3,475
(+26.18%)
2,754
PassMark G2D Mark
720
(+124.3%)
321
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
--
48.1
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
--
47.6
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon Pro 560Quadro K4100M
CodenamePolaris 21GK104
ArchitectureGCN 4.0Kepler
Process Size14 nm28 nm
Transistors3,000 million3,540 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon Pro 560Quadro K4100M
Memory Size4 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth81.28 Gb/s102.4 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,270 MHz800 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit256 bit
L1 Cache16 KB16 KB
L2 Cache1,024 KB512 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon Pro 560Quadro K4100M
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8MXM-B (3.0)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)75 W100 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon Pro 560Quadro K4100M
Stream Processors (SP)1,024--
CUDA Cores--1,152
Compute Units (CU)16--
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--6
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)6496
Render Output Units (ROP)1632
Core Clock Speed907 MHz706 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--706 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon Pro 560Quadro K4100M
Pixel Fill Rate14.51 GPixel/s16.94 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate58.05 GTexel/s67.78 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1.86 TFLOPS1.63 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance116.1 GFLOPS67.78 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon Pro 560Quadro K4100M
DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
OpenCL2.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.76.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.