AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs Intel Arc A350M

VS
Performance
Radeon Pro 560
5,3055% of 104,598
Arc A350M102% better
10,73010% of 104,598

The Arc A350M has 102% better performance than the Radeon Pro 560 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon Pro 560
No data available
Arc A350M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon Pro 560 and the Arc A350M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon Pro 560
Shop Arc A350M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon Pro 560 GPU

The AMD Radeon Pro 560 is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2017. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Polaris 21) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Pro 560 has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,270 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 81.28 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Pro 560 includes 1,024 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 907 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Pro 560 has the 242nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.07% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the Intel Arc A350M GPU

The Intel Arc A350M is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2022. It is built on the Generation 12.7 GPU microarchitecture (codename DG2-128) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.

Memory

The Arc A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,750 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 112 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Arc A350M includes 768 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,150 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,200 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 24 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 96 Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX) optimized for AI workloads and 6 ray tracing units dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 25 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Arc A350M has the 173rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 10.26% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon Pro 560Arc A350M
ManufacturerAMDIntel
ArchitectureGCN 4.0Generation 12.7
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2017Q1 2022
Production StatusActiveActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Riders Republic
Riders Republic
Display FPS for Hogwarts Legacy
Hogwarts Legacy
Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt (4.0)
The Witcher 3 (4.0)
Display FPS for High On Life
High On Life
Display FPS for The Callisto Protocol
The Callisto Protocol
Display FPS for Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Spider-man: Miles Morales
Display FPS for Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (2022)
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (2022)

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Riders Republic
Riders Republic
Radeon Pro 560Arc A350M
Low - 720p
--
60 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
32 FPS
High - 1080p
--
25 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
21 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
12 FPS
4K UHD - 2160p
--
7 FPS
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro 560 orArc A350M
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile12+71%
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile8+14%
Arc A350M7

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro 560 orArc A350M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon Pro 560
5,3055% of 104,598
Arc A350M102% better
10,73010% of 104,598

The Arc A350M has 102% better performance than the Radeon Pro 560 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon Pro 560 is ranked 242nd with a score of 5,305, and the Arc A350M is ranked 173rd with a score of 10,730.

Performance per dollar
Radeon Pro 560
No data available
Arc A350M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon Pro 560 and the Arc A350M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro 560 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q11,082.5+109%
RTX A500 Mobile10,818+104%
Arc A350M10,730+102%
Radeon Pro Vega 1610,569+99%
T600 Mobile10,498+98%
FirePro M61005,369+1%
Quadro M12005,310+0%
Radeon Pro 5605,305
GeForce GTX 960M5,278-1%
Radeon Pro 5555,185-2%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro 560 orArc A350M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon Pro 560Arc A350M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1,376
3,050
(+121.66%)
3DMark Time Spy Score
1,519
3,397
(+123.63%)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
23,105
36,314.5
(+57.17%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
3,892
7,147
(+83.63%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
5,718
10,766
(+88.28%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
86.8
149.3
(+72%)
PassMark G3D Mark
3,475
--
PassMark G2D Mark
720
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon Pro 560Arc A350M
CodenamePolaris 21DG2-128
ArchitectureGCN 4.0Generation 12.7
Process Size14 nm6 nm
Transistors3,000 million7,200 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon Pro 560Arc A350M
Memory Size4 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth81.28 Gb/s112 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,270 MHz1,750 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit64 bit
L1 Cache16 KB1.1 MB
L2 Cache1,024 KB4 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon Pro 560Arc A350M
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)75 W25 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon Pro 560Arc A350M
Stream Processors (SP)1,024--
Shading Units--768
Compute Units (CU)16--
Execution Units (EU)--6
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)6448
Render Output Units (ROP)1624
Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX)--96
Ray Tracing Units (RTU)--6
Core Clock Speed907 MHz1,150 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--2,200 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon Pro 560Arc A350M
Pixel Fill Rate14.51 GPixel/s52.8 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate58.05 GTexel/s105.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1.86 TFLOPS3.38 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance116.1 GFLOPS844.8 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon Pro 560Arc A350M
DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL2.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.76.6

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.