AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs AMD FirePro M2000

VS
Performance
Radeon Pro 560531% better
5,3055% of 104,598
FirePro M2000
8411% of 104,598

The Radeon Pro 560 has 531% better performance than the FirePro M2000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon Pro 560
No data available
FirePro M2000
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon Pro 560 and the FirePro M2000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon Pro 560
Shop FirePro M2000
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon Pro 560 GPU

The AMD Radeon Pro 560 is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2017. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Polaris 21) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Pro 560 has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,270 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 81.28 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Pro 560 includes 1,024 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 907 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Pro 560 has the 242nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.07% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD FirePro M2000 GPU

The AMD FirePro M2000 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q3 2012. It is built on the TeraScale 2 GPU microarchitecture (codename Turks) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.

Memory

The FirePro M2000 has 1,024 MB of GDDR5 memory, with a 800 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 25.6 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The FirePro M2000 includes 480 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 500 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 33 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The FirePro M2000 has the 478th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.80% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon Pro 560FirePro M2000
ManufacturerAMDAMD
ArchitectureGCN 4.0TeraScale 2
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2017Q3 2012
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#
Our database does not have gaming performance data for the AMD Radeon Pro 560 or the AMD FirePro M2000.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon Pro 560531% better
5,3055% of 104,598
FirePro M2000
8411% of 104,598

The Radeon Pro 560 has 531% better performance than the FirePro M2000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon Pro 560 is ranked 242nd with a score of 5,305, and the FirePro M2000 is ranked 478th with a score of 841.

Performance per dollar
Radeon Pro 560
No data available
FirePro M2000
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon Pro 560 and the FirePro M2000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro 560 or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro 560 orFirePro M2000
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon Pro 560FirePro M2000
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1,376
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
1,519
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
23,105
--
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
3,892
--
3DMark 11 Performance Score
5,718
(+499.37%)
954
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
86.8
--
PassMark G3D Mark
3,475
(+717.65%)
425
PassMark G2D Mark
720
(+249.51%)
206
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon Pro 560FirePro M2000
CodenamePolaris 21Turks
ArchitectureGCN 4.0TeraScale 2
Process Size14 nm40 nm
Transistors3,000 million716 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon Pro 560FirePro M2000
Memory Size4 GB1,024 MB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth81.28 Gb/s25.6 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,270 MHz800 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit64 bit
L1 Cache16 KB--
L2 Cache1,024 KB--

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon Pro 560FirePro M2000
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)75 W33 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon Pro 560FirePro M2000
Stream Processors (SP)1,024480
Compute Units (CU)166
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)6424
Render Output Units (ROP)168
Core Clock Speed907 MHz500 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon Pro 560FirePro M2000
Pixel Fill Rate14.51 GPixel/s4 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate58.05 GTexel/s12 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1.86 TFLOPS480 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance116.1 GFLOPS--

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon Pro 560FirePro M2000
DirectX12 (12_0)11.2 (11_0)
OpenCL2.11.2
OpenGL4.64.4
Shader Model6.75.0

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.