AMD Radeon Pro 460 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX230

VS
Performance
Radeon Pro 460101% better
6,7496% of 104,598
GeForce MX230
3,363.53% of 104,598

The Radeon Pro 460 has 101% better performance than the GeForce MX230 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon Pro 460
No data available
GeForce MX230
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon Pro 460 and the GeForce MX230 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon Pro 460
Shop GeForce MX230
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon Pro 460 GPU

The AMD Radeon Pro 460 is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q4 2016. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Baffin) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Pro 460 has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,270 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 81.28 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Pro 460 includes 1,024 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 850 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 907 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 35 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Pro 460 has the 222nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 6.45% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce MX230 GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce MX230 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2019. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP108) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The MX230 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,502 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 48.06 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The MX230 includes 256 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,519 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,531 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 16 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The MX230 has the 287th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.22% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon Pro 460GeForce MX230
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureGCN 4.0Pascal
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ4 2016Q1 2019
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3
Display FPS for GRID (2019)
GRID (2019)
Display FPS for Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Breakpoint
Ghost Recon Breakpoint
Display FPS for FIFA 20
FIFA 20
Display FPS for Control
Control
Display FPS for F1 2019
F1 2019
Display FPS for Total War: Three Kingdoms
Total War: Three Kingdoms

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3
Radeon Pro 460GeForce MX230
Low - 720p
--
40 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
16 FPS
High - 1080p
--
10 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
7 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro 460 orGeForce MX230
GPUFrames Per Second
Iris Xe MAX11.7+58%
GeForce GTX 950M10.3+39%
GeForce MX25010.2+38%
GeForce MX3308.8+19%
GeForce MX1508.4+14%
GeForce MX2307.4
Radeon 610M6-19%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro 460 orGeForce MX230
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon Pro 460101% better
6,7496% of 104,598
GeForce MX230
3,363.53% of 104,598

The Radeon Pro 460 has 101% better performance than the GeForce MX230 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon Pro 460 is ranked 222nd with a score of 6,749, and the GeForce MX230 is ranked 287th with a score of 3,363.5.

Performance per dollar
Radeon Pro 460
No data available
GeForce MX230
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon Pro 460 and the GeForce MX230 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro 460 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon HD 8970M6,818+1%
Radeon R9 M290X6,817+1%
Radeon Pro 4606,749
Radeon 660M6,743-0%
GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)6,736-0%
Quadro K4000M3,466-49%
GeForce GTX 760M3,369-50%
GeForce MX2303,363.5-50%
Radeon R9 M3753,314-51%
GeForce 945M3,309.5-51%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro 460 orGeForce MX230
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon Pro 460GeForce MX230
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
748
3DMark Time Spy Score
1,374
(+63.67%)
839.5
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
27,064
(+71.33%)
15,796.5
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
4,584
(+85.78%)
2,467.5
3DMark 11 Performance Score
6,963
(+92.27%)
3,621.5
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
114.7
(+37.53%)
83.4
PassMark G3D Mark
3,453
(+88.17%)
1,835
PassMark G2D Mark
680
(+219.25%)
213
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon Pro 460GeForce MX230
CodenameBaffinGP108
ArchitectureGCN 4.0Pascal
Process Size14 nm14 nm
Transistors3,000 million1,800 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon Pro 460GeForce MX230
Memory Size4 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth81.28 Gb/s48.06 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,270 MHz1,502 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit64 bit
L1 Cache16 KB48 KB
L2 Cache1,024 KB512 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon Pro 460GeForce MX230
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x4
Thermal Design Power (TDP)35 W10 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon Pro 460GeForce MX230
Stream Processors (SP)1,024--
CUDA Cores--256
Compute Units (CU)16--
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--2
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)6416
Render Output Units (ROP)1616
Core Clock Speed850 MHz1,519 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)907 MHz1,531 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon Pro 460GeForce MX230
Pixel Fill Rate14.51 GPixel/s24.5 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate58.05 GTexel/s24.5 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1.86 TFLOPS783.9 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance116.1 GFLOPS24.5 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon Pro 460GeForce MX230
DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
OpenCL2.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.76.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.