AMD Radeon Pro 455 vs NVIDIA GeForce 920M

VS
Performance
Radeon Pro 455214% better
5,3885% of 104,598
GeForce 920M
1,718.52% of 104,598

The Radeon Pro 455 has 214% better performance than the GeForce 920M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon Pro 455
No data available
GeForce 920M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon Pro 455 and the GeForce 920M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon Pro 455
Shop GeForce 920M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon Pro 455 GPU

The AMD Radeon Pro 455 is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q4 2016. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Baffin) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Pro 455 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,270 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 81.28 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Pro 455 includes 768 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 855 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 35 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Pro 455 has the 236th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.15% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce 920M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce 920M is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2015. It is built on the Kepler 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GK208B) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The 920M has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 14.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 920M includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 954 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 954 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 33 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The 920M has the 391st best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.64% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon Pro 455GeForce 920M
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureGCN 4.0Kepler 2.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ4 2016Q1 2015
Production StatusActiveActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 2020
F1 2020
Display FPS for Total War: Three Kingdoms
Total War: Three Kingdoms
Display FPS for Dirt Rally 2.0
Dirt Rally 2.0
Display FPS for Far Cry New Dawn
Far Cry New Dawn
Display FPS for Metro Exodus
Metro Exodus
Display FPS for Just Cause 4
Just Cause 4
Display FPS for Darksiders III
Darksiders III

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 2020
F1 2020
Radeon Pro 455GeForce 920M
Low - 720p
--
16 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
--
High - 1080p
--
--
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro 455 orGeForce 920M
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce MX13052+219%
GeForce 940MX48.3+196%
GeForce 930MX43.1+164%
Radeon R5 M25533+102%
GeForce MX11033+102%
GeForce 920M16.3

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro 455 orGeForce 920M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon Pro 455214% better
5,3885% of 104,598
GeForce 920M
1,718.52% of 104,598

The Radeon Pro 455 has 214% better performance than the GeForce 920M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon Pro 455 is ranked 236th with a score of 5,388, and the GeForce 920M is ranked 391st with a score of 1,718.5.

Performance per dollar
Radeon Pro 455
No data available
GeForce 920M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon Pro 455 and the GeForce 920M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro 455 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon HD 6970M X25,541.5+3%
Radeon R9 M385X5,514.5+2%
Radeon Pro 4555,388
FirePro M61005,369-0%
Quadro M12005,310-1%
FirePro M41001,728-68%
GeForce GT 730M1,722-68%
GeForce 920M1,718.5-68%
GeForce GT 735M1,713-68%
Radeon HD 8750M1,698-68%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Pro 455 orGeForce 920M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon Pro 455GeForce 920M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1,118
(+239.82%)
329
3DMark Time Spy Score
1,254
(+245.45%)
363
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
23,434
(+223.58%)
7,242
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
3,759
(+223.63%)
1,161.5
3DMark 11 Performance Score
5,774
(+216.9%)
1,822
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
100
(+125.73%)
44.3
PassMark G3D Mark
3,113
(+331.76%)
721
PassMark G2D Mark
696
(+494.87%)
117
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon Pro 455GeForce 920M
CodenameBaffinGK208B
ArchitectureGCN 4.0Kepler 2.0
Process Size14 nm28 nm
Transistors3,000 million1,020 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon Pro 455GeForce 920M
Memory Size2 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5DDR3
Memory Bandwidth81.28 Gb/s14.4 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,270 MHz900 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit64 bit
L1 Cache16 KB16 KB
L2 Cache1,024 KB512 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon Pro 455GeForce 920M
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)35 W33 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon Pro 455GeForce 920M
Stream Processors (SP)768--
CUDA Cores--384
Compute Units (CU)12--
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--2
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)4832
Render Output Units (ROP)168
Core Clock Speed855 MHz954 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--954 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon Pro 455GeForce 920M
Pixel Fill Rate13.68 GPixel/s7.63 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate41.04 GTexel/s30.53 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1,313 GFLOPS732.7 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance82.08 GFLOPS30.53 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon Pro 455GeForce 920M
DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
OpenCL2.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.76.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.