Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Radeon HD 8750M
1,6982% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti1,520% better
27,50326% of 104,598
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti has 1,520% better performance than the Radeon HD 8750M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Radeon HD 8750M
No data available
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
68.9343% of 161.45
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti has 43% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Shop Radeon HD 8750M
Shop GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the AMD Radeon HD 8750M GPU
The AMD Radeon HD 8750M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2013. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Mars) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The HD 8750M has 1,024 MB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,000 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The HD 8750M includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 620 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 775 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Benchmark Performance
The HD 8750M has the 394th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.62% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q4 2017 with a MSRP of $399. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP104) and is manufactured on a 16 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 1070 Ti has 8 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 2,002 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 256.3 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 1070 Ti includes 2,432 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,607 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,683 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 152 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GTX 1070 Ti occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 450 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 180 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The GTX 1070 Ti has the 86th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 26.29% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 27,503 score and $399 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 68.93. This is the 46th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon HD 8750M | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Pascal |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q1 2013 | Q4 2017 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | -- | $399 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Control
F1 2019
Total War: Three Kingdoms
Anno 1800
Far Cry New Dawn
Metro Exodus
Apex Legends
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Control | Radeon HD 8750M | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | -- | 200 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 78 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 59 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | 37 FPS |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | 18 FPS |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 8750M orGeForce GTX 1070 Ti
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 2060 | 22.7 | +27% |
| Radeon RX Vega 64 | 22.2 | +24% |
| Radeon RX 6600 | 22 | +23% |
| Radeon RX 5600 XT | 22 | +23% |
| GeForce GTX 1080 | 19.7 | +10% |
| GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | 17.9 | |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | 17.9 | +0% |
| GeForce GTX 1070 | 17.2 | -4% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 17 | -5% |
| GeForce GTX 980 Ti | 16.4 | -8% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 8750M orGeForce GTX 1070 Ti
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 2070 | 17.76 | -20% |
| Radeon RX 590 | 18.6 | -17% |
| Radeon RX 480 | 18.93 | -15% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 | 20.09 | -10% |
| GeForce GTX 1070 | 22.03 | -1% |
| GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | 22.29 | |
| Radeon RX Vega 64 | 22.48 | +1% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 22.7 | +2% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | 22.99 | +3% |
| Radeon VII | 24.44 | +10% |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Radeon HD 8750M
1,6982% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti1,520% better
27,50326% of 104,598
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti has 1,520% better performance than the Radeon HD 8750M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon HD 8750M is ranked 394th with a score of 1,698, and the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is ranked 86th with a score of 27,503.
Performance per dollar
Radeon HD 8750M
No data available
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
68.9343% of 161.45
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti has 105% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti's 68.93 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 8750M or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX Vega 56 | 29,086 | +1,613% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | 28,375 | +1,571% |
| GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | 27,503 | +1,520% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 | 27,162.5 | +1,500% |
| GeForce GTX 1070 | 24,652 | +1,352% |
| GeForce 920M | 1,718.5 | +1% |
| GeForce GT 735M | 1,713 | +1% |
| Radeon HD 8750M | 1,698 | |
| Radeon R5 M330 | 1,689 | -1% |
| Radeon R5 M430 | 1,689 | -1% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 8750M orGeForce GTX 1070 Ti
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 480 | 78.25 | +14% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 | 77.83 | +13% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | 74.36 | +8% |
| Radeon RX Vega 56 | 72.9 | +6% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 70.07 | +2% |
| GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | 68.93 | |
| GeForce GTX 1070 | 65.04 | -6% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 | 62.65 | -9% |
| Radeon RX Vega 64 | 61.77 | -10% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | 58.6 | -15% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon HD 8750M | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 6,531 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 6,177 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 8,524.5 | 88,161 (+934.21%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 1,276.5 | 18,405 (+1,341.83%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 1,863.5 | 20,106 (+978.94%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 40.2 | -- |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 1,000 | 14,700 (+1,370%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 203 | 878 (+332.51%) |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 16.9 | -- |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon HD 8750M | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Mars | GP104 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Pascal |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Transistors | 950 million | 7,200 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon HD 8750M | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 1,024 MB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 64 Gb/s | 256.3 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,000 MHz | 2,002 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 2 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon HD 8750M | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | -- | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | -- | 180 W |
| Suggested PSU | -- | 450 W |
| Power Connectors | -- | 1x 8-pin |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon HD 8750M | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 384 | -- |
| CUDA Cores | -- | 2,432 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 6 | -- |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | -- | 19 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 24 | 152 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 8 | 64 |
| Core Clock Speed | 620 MHz | 1,607 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 775 MHz | 1,683 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon HD 8750M | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 5.36 GPixel/s | 107.7 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 16.08 GTexel/s | 255.8 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 514.6 GFLOPS | 8.19 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 32.16 GFLOPS | 255.8 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon HD 8750M | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 (1.2) | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.