AMD Radeon HD 8670M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

VS
Performance
Radeon HD 8670M
1,3961% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q1,149% better
17,43917% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has 1,149% better performance than the Radeon HD 8670M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon HD 8670M
No data available
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon HD 8670M and the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon HD 8670M
Shop GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon HD 8670M GPU

The AMD Radeon HD 8670M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2013. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Sun) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The HD 8670M has 1,024 MB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 14.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The HD 8670M includes 320 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 925 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 975 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 20 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Benchmark Performance

The HD 8670M has the 416th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.33% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2019. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU116) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 192 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 288 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q includes 1,536 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,140 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,335 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 96 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 48 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 60 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has the 130th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 16.67% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon HD 8670MGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Turing
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2013Q2 2019
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Flight Simulator 2020
Flight Simulator 2020
Display FPS for Horizon Zero Dawn
Horizon Zero Dawn
Display FPS for Death Stranding
Death Stranding
Display FPS for F1 2020
F1 2020
Display FPS for Gears Tactics
Gears Tactics
Display FPS for Doom Eternal
Doom Eternal
Display FPS for Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Flight Simulator 2020
Flight Simulator 2020
Radeon HD 8670MGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Low - 720p
--
55 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
49 FPS
High - 1080p
--
37 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
25 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 8670M orGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 8670M orGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon HD 8670M
1,3961% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q1,149% better
17,43917% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has 1,149% better performance than the Radeon HD 8670M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon HD 8670M is ranked 416th with a score of 1,396, and the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is ranked 130th with a score of 17,439.

Performance per dollar
Radeon HD 8670M
No data available
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon HD 8670M and the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 8670M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon RX 6500M17,889+1,181%
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q17,523+1,155%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q17,439+1,149%
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB)17,421+1,148%
GeForce GTX 980 Mobile17,200.5+1,132%
Radeon HD 6850M1,469.5+5%
GeForce 910M1,413+1%
Radeon HD 8670M1,396
Radeon HD 8730M1,370.5-2%
FirePro M59501,350-3%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 8670M orGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon HD 8670MGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
5,084.5
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
5,072
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
4,840
63,086
(+1,203.43%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
829
13,355
(+1,510.98%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
1,513
15,913
(+951.75%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
64.4
96.9
(+50.47%)
PassMark G3D Mark
520
8,608
(+1,555.38%)
PassMark G2D Mark
495
(+37.12%)
361
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
9.4
--
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
7.6
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon HD 8670MGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
CodenameSunTU116
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Turing
Process Size28 nm12 nm
Transistors690 million6,600 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon HD 8670MGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Memory Size1,024 MB6 GB
Memory TypeDDR3GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth14.4 Gb/s288 Gb/s
Memory Clock900 MHz1,500 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit192 bit
L1 Cache16 KB64 KB
L2 Cache128 KB1,536 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon HD 8670MGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)--60 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon HD 8670MGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Stream Processors (SP)320--
CUDA Cores--1,536
Compute Units (CU)5--
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--24
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)2096
Render Output Units (ROP)848
Core Clock Speed925 MHz1,140 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)975 MHz1,335 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon HD 8670MGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Pixel Fill Rate7.8 GPixel/s64.08 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate19.5 GTexel/s128.2 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance624 GFLOPS4.1 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance39 GFLOPS128.2 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon HD 8670MGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)3.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.