Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Radeon HD 8550M
1,3071% of 104,598
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti5,685% better
75,61272% of 104,598
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 5,685% better performance than the Radeon HD 8550M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Radeon HD 8550M
No data available
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
94.6359% of 161.45
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 59% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Shop Radeon HD 8550M
Shop GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the AMD Radeon HD 8550M GPU
The AMD Radeon HD 8550M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q3 2014. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Sun) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The HD 8550M has 1,024 MB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 14.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The HD 8550M includes 320 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 650 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 850 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 20 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Benchmark Performance
The HD 8550M has the 423rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.25% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q1 2023 with a MSRP of $799. It is built on the Ada Lovelace GPU microarchitecture (codename AD104) and is manufactured on a 5 nm process.
Memory
The RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory, with a 1,313 MHz memory clock and a 192 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 504.2 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RTX 4070 Ti includes 7,680 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 2,310 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,610 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 240 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 80 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 240 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 60 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The RTX 4070 Ti occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 600 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 285 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The RTX 4070 Ti has the 6th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 72.29% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 75,612 score and $799 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 94.63. This is the 22nd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon HD 8550M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q3 2014 | Q1 2023 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | -- | $799 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Sons of the Forest
Far Cry 6
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
The Last of Us
Resident Evil 4 (Remake)
Company of Heroes 3
Atomic Heart
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Sons of the Forest | Radeon HD 8550M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 119 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 117 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 113 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 113 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | 110 FPS |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | 83 FPS |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 8550M orGeForce RTX 4070 Ti
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | 103 | +25% |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | 103 | +25% |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | 92.3 | +12% |
| Radeon RX 7900 XT | 86 | +4% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | 82.7 | |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | 77.6 | -6% |
| GeForce RTX 3090 | 75 | -9% |
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | 70 | -15% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 | 69.5 | -16% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 8550M orGeForce RTX 4070 Ti
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 7700 XT | 7.61 | -21% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | 7.83 | -19% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) | 7.98 | -17% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 8.85 | -8% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16 GB) | 9.65 | +-0% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | 9.66 | |
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | 9.7 | +0% |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | 9.7 | +0% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 | 9.88 | +2% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | 10.03 | +4% |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Radeon HD 8550M
1,3071% of 104,598
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti5,685% better
75,61272% of 104,598
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 5,685% better performance than the Radeon HD 8550M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon HD 8550M is ranked 423rd with a score of 1,307, and the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is ranked 6th with a score of 75,612.
Performance per dollar
Radeon HD 8550M
No data available
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
94.6359% of 161.45
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 145% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 94.63 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 8550M or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | 83,322 | +6,275% |
| Radeon RX 7900 XT | 75,896 | +5,707% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | 75,612 | +5,685% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | 74,834 | +5,626% |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | 72,227.5 | +5,426% |
| Radeon HD 7690M XT | 1,346 | +3% |
| Radeon HD 6770M | 1,328 | +2% |
| Radeon HD 8550M | 1,307 | |
| GeForce 820M | 1,266.5 | -3% |
| Quadro 2000M | 1,261 | -4% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 8550M orGeForce RTX 4070 Ti
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | 114.15 | +21% |
| Radeon RX 6600 XT | 103.04 | +9% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | 100.12 | +6% |
| Radeon RX 6800 | 95.14 | +1% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 95.09 | +0% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | 94.63 | |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | 93.66 | -1% |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | 87.14 | -8% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16 GB) | 86.4 | -9% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 | 86.18 | -9% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon HD 8550M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 22,949 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 22,481 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | -- | 217,200 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | -- | 53,360 |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | -- | 210,101 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 1,242 | 56,052 (+4,413.04%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | -- | 31,806 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | -- | 1,191 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 11.2 | -- |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon HD 8550M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Sun | AD104 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistors | 690 million | 35,800 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon HD 8550M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 1,024 MB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | DDR3 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 14.4 Gb/s | 504.2 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 900 MHz | 1,313 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 64 bit | 192 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 48 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon HD 8550M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | -- | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | -- | 285 W |
| Suggested PSU | -- | 600 W |
| Power Connectors | -- | 1x 16-pin |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon HD 8550M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 320 | -- |
| CUDA Cores | -- | 7,680 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 5 | -- |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | -- | 60 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 20 | 240 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 8 | 80 |
| Tensor Cores | -- | 240 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | -- | 60 |
| Core Clock Speed | 650 MHz | 2,310 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 850 MHz | 2,610 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon HD 8550M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 6.8 GPixel/s | 208.8 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 17 GTexel/s | 626.4 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 544 GFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 34 GFLOPS | 626.4 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon HD 8550M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 (1.2) | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.