AMD Radeon HD 8280 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

VS
Performance
Radeon HD 8280
4960% of 104,598
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL1,920% better
10,02010% of 104,598

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 1,920% better performance than the Radeon HD 8280 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon HD 8280
No data available
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon HD 8280 and the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon HD 8280
Shop Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon HD 8280 GPU

The AMD Radeon HD 8280 is an end-of-life integrated graphics card that released in Q3 2013. It is built on the GCN 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Kalindi) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The HD 8280 includes 128 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 450 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 8 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 4 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The HD 8280 has the 518th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.47% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL GPU

The AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q2 2018. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Polaris 22) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Pro WX Vega M GL has 4 GB of HBM2 memory, with a 700 MHz memory clock and a 1,024 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 179.2 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Pro WX Vega M GL includes 1,280 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 931 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,011 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 80 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 65 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Pro WX Vega M GL has the 179th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 9.58% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon HD 8280Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
ManufacturerAMDAMD
ArchitectureGCN 2.0GCN 4.0
Market SegmentIntegratedIntegrated
Release DateQ3 2013Q2 2018
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Assassin´s Creed Odyssey
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey
Display FPS for Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Display FPS for Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
Display FPS for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Display FPS for Rocket League
Rocket League
Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3
Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Assassin´s Creed Odyssey
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey
Radeon HD 8280Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Low - 720p
--
44 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
33 FPS
High - 1080p
--
27 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
17 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
10 FPS
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 8280 orRadeon Pro WX Vega M GL
GPUFrames Per Second
Radeon RX Vega M GL11+10%
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL10
Radeon RX Vega 115-50%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 8280 orRadeon Pro WX Vega M GL
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon HD 8280
4960% of 104,598
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL1,920% better
10,02010% of 104,598

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 1,920% better performance than the Radeon HD 8280 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon HD 8280 is ranked 518th with a score of 496, and the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is ranked 179th with a score of 10,020.

Performance per dollar
Radeon HD 8280
No data available
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon HD 8280 and the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 8280 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon RX Vega M GH14,302+2,783%
Radeon 780M12,785+2,478%
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL10,020+1,920%
Radeon RX Vega M GL9,862+1,888%
Radeon 760M9,603+1,836%
Radeon HD 8330530+7%
HD Graphics 4000523+5%
Radeon HD 8280496
Radeon HD 6520G492-1%
HD Graphics (Haswell, 10EU)484-2%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 8280 orRadeon Pro WX Vega M GL
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon HD 8280Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
2,062
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
2,213
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
2,515
38,986
(+1,450.14%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
328
7,333
(+2,135.67%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
554
9,731
(+1,656.5%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
11
132.5
(+1,104.55%)
PassMark G3D Mark
261
4,643
(+1,678.93%)
PassMark G2D Mark
76
406
(+434.21%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon HD 8280Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
CodenameKalindiPolaris 22
ArchitectureGCN 2.0GCN 4.0
Process Size28 nm14 nm
Transistors1,178 million5,000 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon HD 8280Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Memory SizeSystem Shared4 GB
Memory TypeSystem SharedHBM2
Memory BandwidthSystem Dependent179.2 Gb/s
Memory ClockSystem Shared700 MHz
Memory InterfaceSystem Shared1,024 bit
L1 Cache--16 KB
L2 Cache--1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon HD 8280Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Bus InterfaceIGPIGP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W65 W
OutputsMotherboard DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon HD 8280Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Stream Processors (SP)1281,280
Compute Units (CU)220
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)880
Render Output Units (ROP)432
Core Clock Speed450 MHz931 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--1,011 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon HD 8280Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Pixel Fill Rate1.8 GPixel/s32.35 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate3.6 GTexel/s80.88 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance115.2 GFLOPS2.59 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance7.2 GFLOPS161.8 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon HD 8280Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
OpenCL2.12.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.56.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.