AMD Radeon HD 8250 vs AMD Radeon 890M

VS
Performance
Radeon HD 8250
422.50% of 104,598
Radeon 890M3,367% better
14,646.514% of 104,598

The Radeon 890M has 3,367% better performance than the Radeon HD 8250 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon HD 8250
No data available
Radeon 890M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon HD 8250 and the Radeon 890M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon HD 8250
Shop Radeon 890M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon HD 8250 GPU

The AMD Radeon HD 8250 is an end-of-life integrated graphics card that released in Q2 2013. It is built on the GCN 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Kalindi) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The HD 8250 includes 128 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 400 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 8 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 4 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 8 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The HD 8250 has the 527th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.40% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon 890M GPU

The AMD Radeon 890M is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q3 2024. It is built on the RDNA 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Phoenix) and is manufactured on a 4 nm process.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 890M includes 1,024 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 400 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,900 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 16 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The 890M has the 147th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 14.00% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon HD 8250Radeon 890M
ManufacturerAMDAMD
ArchitectureGCN 2.0RDNA 3.0
Market SegmentIntegratedIntegrated
Release DateQ2 2013Q3 2024
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Ghost of Tsushima
Ghost of Tsushima
Display FPS for Total War: PHARAOH
Total War: PHARAOH
Display FPS for Baldur's Gate 3
Baldur's Gate 3
Display FPS for F1 23
F1 23
Display FPS for EA Sports F1 22
EA Sports F1 22
Display FPS for Strange Brigade
Strange Brigade
Display FPS for X-Plane 11
X-Plane 11

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Ghost of Tsushima
Ghost of Tsushima
Radeon HD 8250Radeon 890M
Low - 1080p
--
35 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
28 FPS
High - 1080p
--
19 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
19 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 8250 orRadeon 890M
GPUFrames Per Second
Radeon 760M28.5+52%
Radeon 890M18.7
Radeon 780M14-25%
Radeon 740M9.53-49%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 8250 orRadeon 890M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon HD 8250
422.50% of 104,598
Radeon 890M3,367% better
14,646.514% of 104,598

The Radeon 890M has 3,367% better performance than the Radeon HD 8250 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon HD 8250 is ranked 527th with a score of 422.5, and the Radeon 890M is ranked 147th with a score of 14,646.5.

Performance per dollar
Radeon HD 8250
No data available
Radeon 890M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon HD 8250 and the Radeon 890M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 8250 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon 890M14,646.5+3,367%
Radeon RX Vega M GH14,302+3,285%
Radeon 780M12,785+2,926%
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL10,020+2,272%
Radeon RX Vega M GL9,862+2,234%
Radeon HD 7420G453+7%
Radeon HD 8240427.5+1%
Radeon HD 8250422.5
Radeon HD 7400G415-2%
Radeon R2 (Beema)397-6%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 8250 orRadeon 890M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon HD 8250Radeon 890M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
3,451
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
3,804
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
1,965
53,940
(+2,645.04%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
253.5
8,905
(+3,412.82%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
468
14,041.5
(+2,900.32%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
207
PassMark G3D Mark
212
7,886
(+3,619.81%)
PassMark G2D Mark
59
1,002
(+1,598.31%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
3.7
--
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
2.9
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon HD 8250Radeon 890M
CodenameKalindiPhoenix
ArchitectureGCN 2.0RDNA 3.0
Process Size28 nm4 nm
Transistors1,178 million25,390 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon HD 8250Radeon 890M
Memory SizeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory TypeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory BandwidthSystem DependentSystem Dependent
Memory ClockSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory InterfaceSystem SharedSystem Shared
L1 Cache--128 KB
L2 Cache--2 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon HD 8250Radeon 890M
Bus InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)8 W15 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon HD 8250Radeon 890M
Stream Processors (SP)1281,024
Compute Units (CU)216
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)864
Render Output Units (ROP)432
Ray Accelerators--16
Core Clock Speed300 MHz400 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)400 MHz2,900 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon HD 8250Radeon 890M
Pixel Fill Rate1.6 GPixel/s92.8 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate3.2 GTexel/s185.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance102.4 GFLOPS11.88 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance6.4 GFLOPS742.4 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon HD 8250Radeon 890M
DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL2.12.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.56.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.