Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Radeon HD 8210
343.50% of 104,598
UHD Graphics 770898% better
3,4283% of 104,598
The UHD Graphics 770 has 898% better performance than the Radeon HD 8210 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Radeon HD 8210
No data available
UHD Graphics 770
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon HD 8210 and the UHD Graphics 770 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Shop Radeon HD 8210
Shop UHD Graphics 770
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the AMD Radeon HD 8210 GPU
The AMD Radeon HD 8210 is an end-of-life integrated graphics card that released in Q1 2014. It is built on the GCN 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Kalindi) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The HD 8210 includes 128 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 8 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 4 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 8 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The HD 8210 has the 534th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.33% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the Intel UHD Graphics 770 GPU
The Intel UHD Graphics 770 is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q4 2021. It is built on the Generation 12.2 GPU microarchitecture (codename Alder Lake GT1) and is manufactured on a 10 nm process.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The UHD Graphics 770 includes 256 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,450 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 16 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The UHD Graphics 770 has the 284th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.28% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon HD 8210 | UHD Graphics 770 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Generation 12.2 |
| Market Segment | Integrated | Integrated |
| Release Date | Q1 2014 | Q4 2021 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
F1 24
Alone in the Dark (2024)
Sons of the Forest
Last Epoch
Helldivers 2
Palworld
Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
F1 24 | Radeon HD 8210 | UHD Graphics 770 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 21 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 18 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 13 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 8210 orUHD Graphics 770
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon 780M | 48 | +269% |
| Radeon 760M | 38.5 | +196% |
| Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) | 26 | +100% |
| Radeon 740M | 24 | +85% |
| UHD Graphics 770 | 13 | |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 8210 orUHD Graphics 770
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Radeon HD 8210
343.50% of 104,598
UHD Graphics 770898% better
3,4283% of 104,598
The UHD Graphics 770 has 898% better performance than the Radeon HD 8210 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon HD 8210 is ranked 534th with a score of 343.5, and the UHD Graphics 770 is ranked 284th with a score of 3,428.
Performance per dollar
Radeon HD 8210
No data available
UHD Graphics 770
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon HD 8210 and the UHD Graphics 770 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 8210 or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon R8 M445DX | 3,775 | +999% |
| Radeon RX Vega 5 | 3,535 | +929% |
| UHD Graphics 770 | 3,428 | +898% |
| Radeon RX Vega 10 | 3,389 | +887% |
| Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake, 48EU) | 3,225 | +839% |
| HD Graphics (Braswell) | 395 | +15% |
| HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) | 349 | +2% |
| Radeon HD 8210 | 343.5 | |
| Radeon HD 7340 | 331.5 | -3% |
| HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) | 315 | -8% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 8210 orUHD Graphics 770
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon HD 8210 | UHD Graphics 770 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 738 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 856 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 1,904.5 | 16,443 (+763.38%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 227 | 2,655 (+1,069.6%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | -- | 12,097 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 370.5 | 3,957 (+968.02%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 7.7 | 86.9 (+1,028.57%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 189 | 1,879 (+894.18%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 46 | 496 (+978.26%) |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | -- | 34.9 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL | -- | 38.5 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon HD 8210 | UHD Graphics 770 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Kalindi | Alder Lake GT1 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Generation 12.2 |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Transistors | 1,178 million | -- |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon HD 8210 | UHD Graphics 770 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | System Dependent |
| Memory Clock | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Interface | System Shared | System Shared |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon HD 8210 | UHD Graphics 770 |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | IGP | Ring Bus |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 8 W | 15 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Motherboard Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon HD 8210 | UHD Graphics 770 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 128 | -- |
| Shading Units | -- | 256 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 2 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 8 | 16 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 4 | 8 |
| Core Clock Speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | -- | 1,450 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon HD 8210 | UHD Graphics 770 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 1.2 GPixel/s | 11.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 2.4 GTexel/s | 23.2 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 76.8 GFLOPS | 742.4 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 4.8 GFLOPS | -- |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon HD 8210 | UHD Graphics 770 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.6 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.