AMD Radeon HD 8210 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

VS
Performance
Radeon HD 8210
343.50% of 104,598
Iris Plus Graphics 655743% better
2,8943% of 104,598

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 has 743% better performance than the Radeon HD 8210 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon HD 8210
No data available
Iris Plus Graphics 655
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon HD 8210 and the Iris Plus Graphics 655 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon HD 8210
Shop Iris Plus Graphics 655
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon HD 8210 GPU

The AMD Radeon HD 8210 is an end-of-life integrated graphics card that released in Q1 2014. It is built on the GCN 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Kalindi) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The HD 8210 includes 128 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 8 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 4 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 8 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The HD 8210 has the 534th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.33% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 GPU

The Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q2 2018. It is built on the Generation 9.5 GPU microarchitecture (codename Coffee Lake GT3e) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 includes 384 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,050 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 6 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 has the 306th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.77% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon HD 8210Iris Plus Graphics 655
ManufacturerAMDIntel
ArchitectureGCN 2.0Generation 9.5
Market SegmentIntegratedIntegrated
Release DateQ1 2014Q2 2018
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for X-Plane 11
X-Plane 11
Display FPS for Dota 2 - Reborn
Dota 2 - Reborn
Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Display FPS for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
CS: GO

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for X-Plane 11
X-Plane 11
Radeon HD 8210Iris Plus Graphics 655
Low - 720p
5 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
3 FPS
--
High - 1080p
3 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 8210 orIris Plus Graphics 655
GPUFrames Per Second
Radeon HD 8610G9.03+241%
Radeon HD 8350G6.08+129%
Radeon HD 84004.68+77%
Radeon HD 82102.65

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 8210 orIris Plus Graphics 655
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon HD 8210
343.50% of 104,598
Iris Plus Graphics 655743% better
2,8943% of 104,598

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 has 743% better performance than the Radeon HD 8210 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon HD 8210 is ranked 534th with a score of 343.5, and the Iris Plus Graphics 655 is ranked 306th with a score of 2,894.

Performance per dollar
Radeon HD 8210
No data available
Iris Plus Graphics 655
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon HD 8210 and the Iris Plus Graphics 655 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 8210 or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 8210 orIris Plus Graphics 655
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon HD 8210Iris Plus Graphics 655
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
604.5
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
684
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
1,904.5
14,343
(+653.11%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
227
1,983
(+773.57%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
370.5
3,180.5
(+758.43%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
7.7
74
(+861.04%)
PassMark G3D Mark
189
1,746
(+823.81%)
PassMark G2D Mark
46
364
(+691.3%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon HD 8210Iris Plus Graphics 655
CodenameKalindiCoffee Lake GT3e
ArchitectureGCN 2.0Generation 9.5
Process Size28 nm14 nm
Transistors1,178 million--

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon HD 8210Iris Plus Graphics 655
Memory SizeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory TypeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory BandwidthSystem DependentSystem Dependent
Memory ClockSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory InterfaceSystem SharedSystem Shared

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon HD 8210Iris Plus Graphics 655
Bus InterfaceIGPRing Bus
Thermal Design Power (TDP)8 W15 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon HD 8210Iris Plus Graphics 655
Stream Processors (SP)128--
Shading Units--384
Compute Units (CU)2--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)848
Render Output Units (ROP)46
Core Clock Speed300 MHz300 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--1,050 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon HD 8210Iris Plus Graphics 655
Pixel Fill Rate1.2 GPixel/s6.3 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate2.4 GTexel/s50.4 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance76.8 GFLOPS806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance4.8 GFLOPS201.6 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon HD 8210Iris Plus Graphics 655
DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
OpenCL2.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.56.4

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.