PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

AMD Radeon HD 7970M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350

AMD
VS
NVIDIA
Performance
Radeon HD 7970M
5,6455% of 104,937
GeForce MX3509% better
6,1666% of 104,937

The GeForce MX350 has 9% better performance than the Radeon HD 7970M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon HD 7970M
No data available
GeForce MX350
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon HD 7970M and the GeForce MX350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon HD 7970M
Shop GeForce MX350
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon HD 7970M GPU

The Radeon HD 7970M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card by AMD. It launched in Q2 2012. Its Wimbledon chip that powers the GPU uses the GCN 1.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 28 nm process.

This GPU is paired with 2 GB of GDDR5 VRAM. Its 1,200 MHz memory clock and 256 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 153.6 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.

This mobile card has a TDP of 100 W.

The Radeon HD 7970M has the 229th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.38% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce MX350 GPU

The GeForce MX350 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card by NVIDIA. It launched in Q1 2020. Its GP107S chip that powers the GPU uses the Pascal architecture and is fabricated on the 14 nm process.

This GPU is paired with 2 GB of GDDR5 VRAM. Its 1,752 MHz memory clock and 64 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 56.06 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.

This mobile card has a TDP of 20 W.

The GeForce MX350 has the 224th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.88% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon HD 7970MGeForce MX350
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Pascal
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2012Q1 2020
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Ready or Not
Ready or Not
Display FPS for The Finals
The Finals
Display FPS for Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora
Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora
Display FPS for EA Sports WRC
EA Sports WRC
Display FPS for Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Display FPS for Total War: PHARAOH
Total War: PHARAOH
More games to choose from
More Games

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Radeon HD 7970MGeForce MX350
Low - 1080p
--
26 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
14 FPS
High - 1080p
--
13 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 7970M orGeForce MX350
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)20.8+63%
Radeon RX 560X (Mobile)20.3+59%
Radeon 660M15.3+20%
GeForce MX35012.8

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 7970M orGeForce MX350
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon HD 7970M
5,6455% of 104,937
GeForce MX3509% better
6,1666% of 104,937

The GeForce MX350 has 9% better performance than the Radeon HD 7970M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon HD 7970M is ranked 229th with a score of 5,645, and the GeForce MX350 is ranked 224th with a score of 6,166.

Performance per dollar
Radeon HD 7970M
No data available
GeForce MX350
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon HD 7970M and the GeForce MX350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 7970M or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 7970M orGeForce MX350
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon HD 7970MGeForce MX350
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
1,335.5
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
1,491
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
31,869
(+28.79%)
24,744
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
4,694
(+7.39%)
4,371
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
--
17,916
3DMark 11 Performance Score
5,907
6,376
(+7.94%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
110
PassMark G3D Mark
3,529
(+25.72%)
2,807
PassMark G2D Mark
502
(+109.17%)
240
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
57.7
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon HD 7970MGeForce MX350
CodenameWimbledonGP107S
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Pascal
Process Size28 nm14 nm
Transistors2,800 million3,300 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon HD 7970MGeForce MX350
Memory Size2 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth153.6 Gb/s56.06 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,200 MHz1,752 MHz
Memory Interface256 bit64 bit
L1 Cache16 KB48 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon HD 7970MGeForce MX350
Bus InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x4
Thermal Design Power (TDP)100 W20 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon HD 7970MGeForce MX350
Stream Processors (SP)1,280--
CUDA Cores--640
Compute Units (CU)20--
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--5
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)8032
Render Output Units (ROP)3216
Core Clock Speed850 MHz1,354 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--1,468 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon HD 7970MGeForce MX350
Pixel Fill Rate27.2 GPixel/s23.49 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate68 GTexel/s46.98 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance2.18 TFLOPS1.88 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance136 GFLOPS58.72 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon HD 7970MGeForce MX350
DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)3.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.