Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition)
6,1946% of 104,598
Arc A31092% better
11,91511% of 104,598
The Arc A310 has 92% better performance than the Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition)
17.7511% of 161.45
Arc A310
No data available
The Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition) has 11% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Shop Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition)
Shop Arc A310
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the AMD Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition) GPU
The AMD Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition) is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q1 2012 with a MSRP of $349. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Pitcairn) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The HD 7870 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,200 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 153.6 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The HD 7870 includes 1,280 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 80 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The HD 7870 occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 1.4a, mini-DisplayPort 1.2 display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 450 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 175 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The HD 7870 has the 226th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.92% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 6,194 score and $349 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 17.75. This is the 90th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
About the Intel Arc A310 GPU
The Intel Arc A310 is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q4 2022. It is built on the Generation 12.7 GPU microarchitecture (codename DG2-128) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.
Memory
The Arc A310 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,937 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 124 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Arc A310 includes 768 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,750 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,750 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 96 Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX) optimized for AI workloads and 6 ray tracing units dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The Arc A310 is a compact, low-profile graphics card that fits into 1 PCIe expansion slot. It supports mini-DisplayPort 2.0 display connections. Intel recommends a power supply of at least 200 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 30 W.
Benchmark Performance
The Arc A310 has the 163rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 11.39% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition) | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 12.7 |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q1 2012 | Q4 2022 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $349 | -- |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Sons of the Forest
Last Epoch
Helldivers 2
Enshrouded
Palworld
Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Ready or Not
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Sons of the Forest | Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition) | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 30 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 19 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 17 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 17 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition) orArc A310
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Arc A750 | 49.7 | +191% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 | 47.1 | +175% |
| Radeon RX 5500 XT | 44.7 | +161% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | 39 | +128% |
| Arc A310 | 17.1 | |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition) orArc A310
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition)
6,1946% of 104,598
Arc A31092% better
11,91511% of 104,598
The Arc A310 has 92% better performance than the Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition) is ranked 226th with a score of 6,194, and the Arc A310 is ranked 163rd with a score of 11,915.
Performance per dollar
Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition)
17.7511% of 161.45
Arc A310
No data available
The Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition) has 27% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition)'s 17.75 performance per dollar ranks it 90th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition) or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 13,645 | +120% |
| Radeon R9 380 | 12,191 | +97% |
| Arc A310 | 11,915 | +92% |
| Radeon R9 280X | 10,792 | +74% |
| GeForce GTX 960 | 10,767.5 | +74% |
| GeForce GTX 760 | 7,962 | +29% |
| Radeon HD 7970 | 7,770 | +25% |
| Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition) | 6,194 | |
| GeForce GTX 750 Ti | 5,378 | -13% |
| GeForce GTX 480 | 5,014 | -19% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition) orArc A310
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 660 Ti | 28.14 | +59% |
| Radeon R9 Nano | 26.63 | +50% |
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 22.34 | +26% |
| GeForce GTX 680 | 20.47 | +15% |
| Radeon HD 7770 (GHz Edition) | 19.48 | +10% |
| Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition) | 17.75 | |
| Radeon HD 6870 | 17.65 | -1% |
| Radeon HD 7970 | 14.15 | -20% |
| GeForce GTX 590 | 13.11 | -26% |
| GeForce GTX 470 | 12.44 | -30% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition) | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 3,269 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 3,743 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | -- | 53,244 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | -- | 8,464 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 6,190 | 13,031 (+110.52%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 120.1 | -- |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 4,634 | 5,496 (+18.6%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 586 | 647 (+10.41%) |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition) | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Pitcairn | DG2-128 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Transistors | 2,800 million | 7,200 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition) | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 153.6 Gb/s | 124 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,200 MHz | 1,937 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 256 bit | 64 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 1.1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 4 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition) | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | 2 slots | 1 slot |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 W | 30 W |
| Suggested PSU | 450 W | 200 W |
| Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin | -- |
| Outputs | DVI, HDMI 1.4a, mini-DisplayPort 1.2 | mini-DisplayPort 2.0 |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition) | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 1,280 | -- |
| Shading Units | -- | 768 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 20 | -- |
| Execution Units (EU) | -- | 6 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 80 | 32 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 32 | 16 |
| Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX) | -- | 96 |
| Ray Tracing Units (RTU) | -- | 6 |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,000 MHz | 1,750 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | -- | 1,750 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition) | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 32 GPixel/s | 28 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 80 GTexel/s | 56 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 2.56 TFLOPS | 2.69 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 160 GFLOPS | 672 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition) | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 (1.2) | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 6.6 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.