AMD Radeon HD 7620G vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
The Iris Pro Graphics 6200 has 192% better performance than the Radeon HD 7620G for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon HD 7620G and the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the AMD Radeon HD 7620G GPU
The AMD Radeon HD 7620G is an end-of-life integrated graphics card that released in Q2 2012. It is built on the TeraScale 3 GPU microarchitecture (codename Devastator) and is manufactured on a 32 nm process.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The HD 7620G includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 360 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 497 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 25 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The HD 7620G has the 462nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.91% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 GPU
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is an end-of-life integrated graphics card that released in Q3 2014. It is built on the Generation 8.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Broadwell GT3e) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Iris Pro Graphics 6200 includes 384 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,100 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 6 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics 6200 has the 312th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.64% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon HD 7620G | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Generation 8.0 |
| Market Segment | Integrated | Integrated |
| Release Date | Q2 2012 | Q3 2014 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Benchmark Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics 6200 has 192% better performance than the Radeon HD 7620G for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon HD 7620G is ranked 462nd with a score of 948, and the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is ranked 312th with a score of 2,766.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon HD 7620G and the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Iris Plus Graphics 655 | 2,894 | +205% |
| Radeon R8 M365DX | 2,862.5 | +202% |
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | 2,766 | +192% |
| Iris Plus Graphics 650 | 2,762 | +191% |
| Radeon R6 M340DX | 2,681 | +183% |
| Radeon R4 (Stoney) | 972.5 | +3% |
| Radeon HD 6550D | 951.5 | +0% |
| Radeon HD 7620G | 948 | |
| UHD Graphics 610 | 922.5 | -3% |
| HD Graphics 4600 | 910.5 | -4% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon HD 7620G | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 5,378 | 15,387.5 (+186.12%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 716 | 1,736.5 (+142.53%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 1,030 | 3,094 (+200.39%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 364 | 1,471 (+304.12%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 111 | 563 (+407.21%) |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon HD 7620G | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Devastator | Broadwell GT3e |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Generation 8.0 |
| Process Size | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Transistors | 1,303 million | -- |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon HD 7620G | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | System Dependent |
| Memory Clock | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Interface | System Shared | System Shared |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon HD 7620G | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | IGP | Ring Bus |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 W | 15 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Motherboard Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon HD 7620G | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 384 | -- |
| Shading Units | -- | 384 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 6 | -- |
| Execution Units (EU) | -- | 48 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 24 | 48 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 8 | 6 |
| Core Clock Speed | 360 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 497 MHz | 1,100 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon HD 7620G | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 3.98 GPixel/s | 6.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 11.93 GTexel/s | 52.8 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 381.7 GFLOPS | 844.8 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | -- | 211.2 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon HD 7620G | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.