AMD Radeon HD 7620G vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)

VS
Performance
Radeon HD 7620G
9481% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)813% better
8,6568% of 104,598

The Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) has 813% better performance than the Radeon HD 7620G for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon HD 7620G
No data available
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon HD 7620G and the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon HD 7620G
Shop Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon HD 7620G GPU

The AMD Radeon HD 7620G is an end-of-life integrated graphics card that released in Q2 2012. It is built on the TeraScale 3 GPU microarchitecture (codename Devastator) and is manufactured on a 32 nm process.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The HD 7620G includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 360 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 497 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 25 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The HD 7620G has the 462nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.91% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2015. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Amethyst) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 M395 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,365 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 174.7 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 M395 includes 1,792 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 834 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 112 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 250 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The R9 M395 has the 192nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 8.28% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon HD 7620GRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
ManufacturerAMDAMD
ArchitectureTeraScale 3GCN 3.0
Market SegmentIntegratedMobile
Release DateQ2 2012Q2 2015
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#
Our database does not have gaming performance data for the AMD Radeon HD 7620G or the AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition).

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon HD 7620G
9481% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)813% better
8,6568% of 104,598

The Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) has 813% better performance than the Radeon HD 7620G for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon HD 7620G is ranked 462nd with a score of 948, and the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) is ranked 192nd with a score of 8,656.

Performance per dollar
Radeon HD 7620G
No data available
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon HD 7620G and the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 7620G or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 7620G orRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon HD 7620GRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
5,378
38,490
(+615.69%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
716
6,819
(+852.37%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
1,030
8,305
(+706.31%)
PassMark G3D Mark
364
4,911
(+1,249.18%)
PassMark G2D Mark
113
719
(+536.28%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon HD 7620GRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
CodenameDevastatorAmethyst
ArchitectureTeraScale 3GCN 3.0
Process Size32 nm28 nm
Transistors1,303 million5,000 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon HD 7620GRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
Memory SizeSystem Shared2 GB
Memory TypeSystem SharedGDDR5
Memory BandwidthSystem Dependent174.7 Gb/s
Memory ClockSystem Shared1,365 MHz
Memory InterfaceSystem Shared256 bit

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon HD 7620GRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
Bus InterfaceIGPMXM-B (3.0)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)25 W250 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon HD 7620GRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
Stream Processors (SP)3841,792
Compute Units (CU)628
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)24112
Render Output Units (ROP)832
Core Clock Speed360 MHz834 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)497 MHz--

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon HD 7620GRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
Pixel Fill Rate3.98 GPixel/s26.69 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate11.93 GTexel/s93.41 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance381.7 GFLOPS2.99 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance--373.6 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon HD 7620GRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_0)
OpenCL1.22.1
OpenGL4.44.6
Shader Model5.06.5

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.