AMD Radeon HD 6970M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350

VS
Performance
Radeon HD 6970M
2,818.53% of 104,598
GeForce MX350119% better
6,1666% of 104,598

The GeForce MX350 has 119% better performance than the Radeon HD 6970M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon HD 6970M
No data available
GeForce MX350
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon HD 6970M and the GeForce MX350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon HD 6970M
Shop GeForce MX350
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon HD 6970M GPU

The AMD Radeon HD 6970M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2011. It is built on the TeraScale 2 GPU microarchitecture (codename Blackcomb) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.

Memory

The HD 6970M has 1,024 MB of GDDR5 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 115.2 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The HD 6970M includes 960 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 680 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The HD 6970M has the 310th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.69% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce MX350 GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce MX350 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2020. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP107S) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The MX350 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,752 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 56.06 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The MX350 includes 640 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,354 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,468 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 20 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The MX350 has the 227th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.89% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon HD 6970MGeForce MX350
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureTeraScale 2Pascal
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2011Q1 2020
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Ready or Not
Ready or Not
Display FPS for The Finals
The Finals
Display FPS for Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora
Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora
Display FPS for EA Sports WRC
EA Sports WRC
Display FPS for Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Display FPS for Total War: PHARAOH
Total War: PHARAOH

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Radeon HD 6970MGeForce MX350
Low - 1080p
--
26 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
14 FPS
High - 1080p
--
13 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 6970M orGeForce MX350
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile20.8+63%
Radeon RX 560X Mobile20.3+59%
Radeon 660M15.3+20%
GeForce MX35012.8

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 6970M orGeForce MX350
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon HD 6970M
2,818.53% of 104,598
GeForce MX350119% better
6,1666% of 104,598

The GeForce MX350 has 119% better performance than the Radeon HD 6970M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon HD 6970M is ranked 310th with a score of 2,818.5, and the GeForce MX350 is ranked 227th with a score of 6,166.

Performance per dollar
Radeon HD 6970M
No data available
GeForce MX350
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon HD 6970M and the GeForce MX350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 6970M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon 660M6,743+139%
GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)6,736+139%
GeForce MX3506,166+119%
GeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition)6,071+115%
GeForce GTX 680M5,897.5+109%
GeForce MX1302,875+2%
Radeon 610M2,863+2%
Radeon HD 6970M2,818.5
GeForce GT 755M2,800.5-1%
GeForce GTX 485M2,709-4%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 6970M orGeForce MX350
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon HD 6970MGeForce MX350
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
1,335.5
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
1,491
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
--
24,744
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
--
4,371
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
--
17,916
3DMark 11 Performance Score
3,054
6,376
(+108.78%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
110
PassMark G3D Mark
2,270
2,805
(+23.57%)
PassMark G2D Mark
651
(+173.53%)
238
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon HD 6970MGeForce MX350
CodenameBlackcombGP107S
ArchitectureTeraScale 2Pascal
Process Size40 nm14 nm
Transistors1,700 million3,300 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon HD 6970MGeForce MX350
Memory Size1,024 MB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth115.2 Gb/s56.06 Gb/s
Memory Clock900 MHz1,752 MHz
Memory Interface256 bit64 bit
L1 Cache8 KB48 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon HD 6970MGeForce MX350
Bus InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x4
Thermal Design Power (TDP)75 W20 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon HD 6970MGeForce MX350
Stream Processors (SP)960--
CUDA Cores--640
Compute Units (CU)12--
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--5
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)4832
Render Output Units (ROP)3216
Core Clock Speed680 MHz1,354 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--1,468 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon HD 6970MGeForce MX350
Pixel Fill Rate21.76 GPixel/s23.49 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate32.64 GTexel/s46.98 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1,306 GFLOPS1.88 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance--58.72 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon HD 6970MGeForce MX350
DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
OpenCL1.23.0
OpenGL4.44.6
Shader Model5.06.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.