AMD Radeon HD 6320 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

VS
Performance
Radeon HD 6320
3020% of 104,598
Iris Plus Graphics 655858% better
2,8943% of 104,598

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 has 858% better performance than the Radeon HD 6320 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon HD 6320
No data available
Iris Plus Graphics 655
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon HD 6320 and the Iris Plus Graphics 655 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon HD 6320
Shop Iris Plus Graphics 655
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon HD 6320 GPU

The AMD Radeon HD 6320 is an end-of-life integrated graphics card that released in Q3 2011. It is built on the TeraScale 2 GPU microarchitecture (codename Loveland) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The HD 6320 includes 80 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 500 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 600 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 8 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 4 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 18 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The HD 6320 has the 537th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.29% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 GPU

The Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q2 2018. It is built on the Generation 9.5 GPU microarchitecture (codename Coffee Lake GT3e) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 includes 384 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,050 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 6 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 has the 306th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.77% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon HD 6320Iris Plus Graphics 655
ManufacturerAMDIntel
ArchitectureTeraScale 2Generation 9.5
Market SegmentIntegratedIntegrated
Release DateQ3 2011Q2 2018
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#
Our database does not have gaming performance data for the AMD Radeon HD 6320 or the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon HD 6320
3020% of 104,598
Iris Plus Graphics 655858% better
2,8943% of 104,598

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 has 858% better performance than the Radeon HD 6320 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon HD 6320 is ranked 537th with a score of 302, and the Iris Plus Graphics 655 is ranked 306th with a score of 2,894.

Performance per dollar
Radeon HD 6320
No data available
Iris Plus Graphics 655
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon HD 6320 and the Iris Plus Graphics 655 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 6320 or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon HD 6320 orIris Plus Graphics 655
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon HD 6320Iris Plus Graphics 655
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
604.5
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
684
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
--
14,343
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
--
1,983
3DMark 11 Performance Score
332.5
3,180.5
(+856.54%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
74
PassMark G3D Mark
147
1,746
(+1,087.76%)
PassMark G2D Mark
44
364
(+727.27%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon HD 6320Iris Plus Graphics 655
CodenameLovelandCoffee Lake GT3e
ArchitectureTeraScale 2Generation 9.5
Process Size40 nm14 nm
Transistors450 million--

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon HD 6320Iris Plus Graphics 655
Memory SizeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory TypeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory BandwidthSystem DependentSystem Dependent
Memory ClockSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory InterfaceSystem SharedSystem Shared

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon HD 6320Iris Plus Graphics 655
Bus InterfaceIGPRing Bus
Thermal Design Power (TDP)18 W15 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon HD 6320Iris Plus Graphics 655
Stream Processors (SP)80--
Shading Units--384
Compute Units (CU)2--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)848
Render Output Units (ROP)46
Core Clock Speed500 MHz300 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)600 MHz1,050 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon HD 6320Iris Plus Graphics 655
Pixel Fill Rate2.03 GPixel/s6.3 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate4.06 GTexel/s50.4 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance81.28 GFLOPS806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance--201.6 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon HD 6320Iris Plus Graphics 655
DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
OpenCL1.23.0
OpenGL4.44.6
Shader Model5.06.4

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.