AMD Radeon Graphics (128SP) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

VS
Performance
Radeon Graphics (128SP)
3,0263% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q266% better
11,082.511% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q has 266% better performance than the Radeon Graphics (128SP) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon Graphics (128SP)
No data available
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon Graphics (128SP) and the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon Graphics (128SP)
Shop GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon Graphics (128SP) GPU

The AMD Radeon Graphics (128SP) is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q3 2022. It is built on the RDNA 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Raphael) and is manufactured on a 5 nm process.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Graphics includes 128 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 400 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,200 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 8 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 2 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Graphics has the 299th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.89% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2019. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU117) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 1650 Max-Q has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,751 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 112.1 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 1650 Max-Q includes 1,024 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,020 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,245 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 1650 Max-Q has the 169th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 10.60% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon Graphics (128SP)GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0Turing
Market SegmentIntegratedMobile
Release DateQ3 2022Q2 2019
Production StatusActiveActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 2021
F1 2021
Display FPS for F1 2020
F1 2020
Display FPS for Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3
Display FPS for Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Display FPS for Need for Speed Heat
NFS Heat
Display FPS for Red Dead Redemption 2
Red Dead Redemption 2
Display FPS for Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)
Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 2021
F1 2021
Radeon Graphics (128SP)GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Low - 720p
46 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
18 FPS
--
High - 1080p
15 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
6 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Graphics (128SP) orGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GPUFrames Per Second
Radeon 780M31+448%
Radeon 760M26.1+361%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)25+342%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)18+218%
UHD Graphics 77015.2+169%
Radeon Graphics (128SP)5.66

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Graphics (128SP) orGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon Graphics (128SP)
3,0263% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q266% better
11,082.511% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q has 266% better performance than the Radeon Graphics (128SP) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon Graphics (128SP) is ranked 299th with a score of 3,026, and the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is ranked 169th with a score of 11,082.5.

Performance per dollar
Radeon Graphics (128SP)
No data available
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon Graphics (128SP) and the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Graphics (128SP) or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon Graphics (128SP) orGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon Graphics (128SP)GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
725
3,016
(+316%)
3DMark Time Spy Score
845
3,070
(+263.31%)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
15,247
45,243.5
(+196.74%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
2,287
7,779
(+240.14%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
3,466
10,471
(+202.11%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
101.4
108.1
(+6.61%)
PassMark G3D Mark
--
6,177
PassMark G2D Mark
--
329
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon Graphics (128SP)GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
CodenameRaphaelTU117
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0Turing
Process Size5 nm12 nm
Transistors3,400 million4,700 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon Graphics (128SP)GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Memory SizeSystem Shared4 GB
Memory TypeSystem SharedGDDR5
Memory BandwidthSystem Dependent112.1 Gb/s
Memory ClockSystem Shared1,751 MHz
Memory InterfaceSystem Shared128 bit
L1 Cache128 KB64 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon Graphics (128SP)GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Bus InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W50 W
OutputsMotherboard DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon Graphics (128SP)GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Stream Processors (SP)128--
CUDA Cores--1,024
Compute Units (CU)2--
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--16
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)864
Render Output Units (ROP)832
Ray Accelerators2--
Core Clock Speed400 MHz1,020 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)2,200 MHz1,245 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon Graphics (128SP)GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Pixel Fill Rate17.6 GPixel/s39.84 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate17.6 GTexel/s79.68 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance563.2 GFLOPS2.55 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance35.2 GFLOPS79.68 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon Graphics (128SP)GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
OpenCL2.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.86.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.