PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

AMD Radeon 840M vs Intel Arc A350M

AMD
VS
Intel
Performance
Radeon 840M
8,4537% of 129,772
Arc A350M27% better
10,7308% of 129,772

The Arc A350M has 27% better performance than the Radeon 840M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon 840M
No data available
Arc A350M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon 840M and the Arc A350M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon 840M
Shop Arc A350M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon 840M GPU

The Radeon 840M is a graphics card by AMD. It is built on the RDNA 3+ GPU microarchitecture and is manufactured on a 4 nm process.

Memory

GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 840M includes 256 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. Additionally, the GPU features 4 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Benchmark Performance

The 840M has the 218th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 566 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 6.51% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090.

About the Intel Arc A350M GPU

The Intel Arc A350M is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2022. It is built on the Generation 12.7 GPU microarchitecture (codename DG2-128) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.

Memory

The Arc A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,750 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 112 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Arc A350M includes 768 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,150 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,200 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 24 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 96 Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX) optimized for AI workloads and 6 ray tracing units dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 25 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Arc A350M has the 194th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 566 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 8.27% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon 840MArc A350M
ManufacturerAMDIntel
ArchitectureRDNA 3+Generation 12.7
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release Date--Q1 2022
Production Status--Active
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2
Space Marine 2
Display FPS for Star Wars Outlaws
Star Wars Outlaws
Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24
Display FPS for Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Display FPS for Ghost of Tsushima
Ghost of Tsushima
Display FPS for Dragon's Dogma 2
Dragon's Dogma 2
Display FPS for Horizon Forbidden West
Horizon Forbidden West

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2
Space Marine 2
Radeon 840MArc A350M
Low - 1080p
16 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
14 FPS
--
High - 1080p
12 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 840M orArc A350M

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 840M orArc A350M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon 840M
8,4537% of 129,772
Arc A350M27% better
10,7308% of 129,772

The Arc A350M has 27% better performance than the Radeon 840M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon 840M is ranked 218th with a score of 8,453, and the Arc A350M is ranked 194th with a score of 10,730.

Performance per dollar
Radeon 840M
No data available
Arc A350M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon 840M and the Arc A350M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 840M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q11,082.5+31%
RTX A500 Mobile10,818+28%
Arc A350M10,730+27%
Radeon Pro Vega 1610,569+25%
T600 Mobile10,498+24%
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)8,656+2%
GeForce GTX 880M8,578+1%
Radeon 840M8,453
Radeon RX 560 Mobile8,329-1%
Quadro M3000M8,288.5-2%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 840M orArc A350M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon 840MArc A350M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1,705
3,050
(+78.89%)
3DMark Time Spy Score
1,928
3,397
(+76.19%)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
37,360
(+2.88%)
36,314.5
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
5,606
7,147
(+27.49%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
8,814
10,766
(+22.15%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
181.3
(+21.43%)
149.3
PassMark G3D Mark
3,925
--
PassMark G2D Mark
905
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon 840MArc A350M
Codename--DG2-128
ArchitectureRDNA 3+Generation 12.7
Process Size4 nm6 nm
Transistors--7,200 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon 840MArc A350M
Memory Size--4 GB
Memory Type--GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth--112 Gb/s
Memory Clock7,500 MHz1,750 MHz
Memory Interface--64 bit
L1 Cache--1.1 MB
L2 Cache--4 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon 840MArc A350M
Bus Interface--PCIe 4.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)--25 W
Outputs--Device Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon 840MArc A350M
Stream Processors (SP)256--
Shading Units--768
Execution Units (EU)--6
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)--48
Render Output Units (ROP)--24
Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX)--96
Ray Accelerators4--
Ray Tracing Units (RTU)--6
Core Clock Speed--1,150 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)2,900 MHz2,200 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon 840MArc A350M
Pixel Fill Rate--52.8 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate--105.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance--3.38 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance--844.8 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon 840MArc A350M
DirectX--12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL--3.0
OpenGL--4.6
Shader Model--6.6

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.