PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

AMD Radeon 840M vs AMD Radeon PRO W6800

AMD
VS
AMD
Performance
Radeon 840M
8,4537% of 129,772
Radeon PRO W6800425% better
44,40434% of 129,772

The Radeon PRO W6800 has 425% better performance than the Radeon 840M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon 840M
No data available
Radeon PRO W6800
19.7412% of 165.13

The Radeon PRO W6800 has 12% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT.

Shop Radeon 840M
Shop Radeon PRO W6800
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon 840M GPU

The Radeon 840M is a graphics card by AMD. It is built on the RDNA 3+ GPU microarchitecture and is manufactured on a 4 nm process.

Memory

GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 840M includes 256 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. Additionally, the GPU features 4 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Benchmark Performance

The 840M has the 219th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 567 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 6.51% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090.

About the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 GPU

The AMD Radeon PRO W6800 is a workstation graphics card that launched in Q2 2021 with a MSRP of $2,249. It is built on the RDNA 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Navi 21) and is manufactured on a 7 nm process.

Memory

The PRO W6800 has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 2,000 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 512 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The PRO W6800 includes 3,840 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 2,075 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,320 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 240 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 96 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 60 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The PRO W6800 occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports mini-DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 600 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 250 W.

Benchmark Performance & Value

The PRO W6800 has the 42nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 567 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 34.22% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090. Its 44,404 score and $2,249 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 19.74. This is the 97th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon 840MRadeon PRO W6800
ManufacturerAMDAMD
ArchitectureRDNA 3+RDNA 2.0
Market SegmentMobileWorkstation
Release Date--Q2 2021
Launch Price (MSRP)--$2,249
Production Status--Active
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2
Space Marine 2
Display FPS for Star Wars Outlaws
Star Wars Outlaws
Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24
Display FPS for Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Display FPS for Ghost of Tsushima
Ghost of Tsushima
Display FPS for Dragon's Dogma 2
Dragon's Dogma 2
Display FPS for Horizon Forbidden West
Horizon Forbidden West

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2
Space Marine 2
Radeon 840MRadeon PRO W6800
Low - 1080p
16 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
14 FPS
--
High - 1080p
12 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 840M orRadeon PRO W6800

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 840M orRadeon PRO W6800
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon 840M
8,4537% of 129,772
Radeon PRO W6800425% better
44,40434% of 129,772

The Radeon PRO W6800 has 425% better performance than the Radeon 840M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon 840M is ranked 219th with a score of 8,453, and the Radeon PRO W6800 is ranked 42nd with a score of 44,404.

Performance per dollar
Radeon 840M
No data available
Radeon PRO W6800
19.7412% of 165.13

The Radeon PRO W6800 has 30% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090.

Radeon PRO W6800's 19.74 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 840M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
RTX 6000 Ada Generation70,850+738%
RTX A600050,957+503%
Radeon PRO W680044,404+425%
Quadro P500020,096+138%
RTX A200019,978+136%
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)8,656+2%
GeForce GTX 880M8,578+1%
Radeon 840M8,453
Radeon RX 560 Mobile8,329-1%
Quadro M3000M8,288.5-2%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 840M orRadeon PRO W6800
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
RTX A200044.49+125%
RTX A2000 (12 GB)44.49+125%
Radeon Pro WX 320021.8+10%
Radeon PRO W680019.74
Quadro P400018.94-4%
Radeon Pro WX 310018.55-6%
RTX A600010.96-44%
RTX 6000 Ada Generation10.42-47%
Quadro P50008.04-59%

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon 840MRadeon PRO W6800
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1,705
12,136
(+611.79%)
3DMark Time Spy Score
1,928
11,941
(+519.35%)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
37,360
92,363
(+147.22%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
5,606
27,937
(+398.34%)
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
--
131,421
3DMark 11 Performance Score
8,814
30,190
(+242.52%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
181.3
(+2.03%)
177.7
PassMark G3D Mark
3,925
20,028
(+410.27%)
PassMark G2D Mark
905
927
(+2.43%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon 840MRadeon PRO W6800
Codename--Navi 21
ArchitectureRDNA 3+RDNA 2.0
Process Size4 nm7 nm
Transistors--26,800 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon 840MRadeon PRO W6800
Memory Size--32 GB
Memory Type--GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth--512 Gb/s
Memory Clock7,500 MHz2,000 MHz
Memory Interface--256 bit
L1 Cache--128 KB
L2 Cache--4 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon 840MRadeon PRO W6800
Slots--2 slots
Bus Interface--PCIe 4.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)--250 W
Suggested PSU--600 W
Power Connectors--1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Outputs--mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon 840MRadeon PRO W6800
Stream Processors (SP)2563,840
Compute Units (CU)--60
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)--240
Render Output Units (ROP)--96
Ray Accelerators460
Core Clock Speed--2,075 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)2,900 MHz2,320 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon 840MRadeon PRO W6800
Pixel Fill Rate--222.7 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate--556.8 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance--17.82 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance--1,113.6 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon 840MRadeon PRO W6800
DirectX--12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL--2.1
OpenGL--4.6
Shader Model--6.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.