AMD Radeon 760M vs Intel HD Graphics 510

VS
Performance
Radeon 760M1,034% better
9,6039% of 104,598
HD Graphics 510
8471% of 104,598

The Radeon 760M has 1,034% better performance than the HD Graphics 510 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon 760M
No data available
HD Graphics 510
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon 760M and the HD Graphics 510 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon 760M
Shop HD Graphics 510
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon 760M GPU

The AMD Radeon 760M is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q1 2023. It is built on the RDNA 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Phoenix) and is manufactured on a 4 nm process.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 760M includes 512 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 800 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,599 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 8 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The 760M has the 185th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 9.18% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the Intel HD Graphics 510 GPU

The Intel HD Graphics 510 is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q3 2015. It is built on the Generation 9.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Skylake GT1) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The HD Graphics 510 has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The HD Graphics 510 includes 96 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 350 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 950 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 12 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 2 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The HD Graphics 510 has the 477th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.81% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon 760MHD Graphics 510
ManufacturerAMDIntel
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0Generation 9.0
Market SegmentIntegratedIntegrated
Release DateQ1 2023Q3 2015
Production StatusActiveActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Black Myth: Wukong
Black Myth: Wukong
Display FPS for Once Human
Once Human
Display FPS for The First Descendant
The First Descendant
Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24
Display FPS for Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Display FPS for Ghost of Tsushima
Ghost of Tsushima
Display FPS for Horizon Forbidden West
Horizon Forbidden West

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Black Myth: Wukong
Black Myth: Wukong
Radeon 760MHD Graphics 510
Low - 1080p
20 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
15 FPS
--
High - 1080p
--
--
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 760M orHD Graphics 510
GPUFrames Per Second
Radeon 780M21+40%
Radeon 760M15

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 760M orHD Graphics 510
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon 760M1,034% better
9,6039% of 104,598
HD Graphics 510
8471% of 104,598

The Radeon 760M has 1,034% better performance than the HD Graphics 510 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon 760M is ranked 185th with a score of 9,603, and the HD Graphics 510 is ranked 477th with a score of 847.

Performance per dollar
Radeon 760M
No data available
HD Graphics 510
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon 760M and the HD Graphics 510 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 760M or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 760M orHD Graphics 510
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon 760MHD Graphics 510
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
2,115.5
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
2,371.5
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
41,767
(+637.41%)
5,664
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
6,141.5
(+888.97%)
621
3DMark 11 Performance Score
9,781.5
(+893.05%)
985
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
189.3
(+576.07%)
28
PassMark G3D Mark
5,790
(+823.44%)
627
PassMark G2D Mark
884
(+442.33%)
163
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
--
9.3
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
--
10.8
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon 760MHD Graphics 510
CodenamePhoenixSkylake GT1
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0Generation 9.0
Process Size4 nm14 nm
Transistors25,390 million--

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon 760MHD Graphics 510
Memory SizeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory TypeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory BandwidthSystem DependentSystem Dependent
Memory ClockSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory InterfaceSystem SharedSystem Shared
L1 Cache128 KB--
L2 Cache2 MB--

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon 760MHD Graphics 510
Bus InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8Ring Bus
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W15 W
OutputsDevice DependentMotherboard Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon 760MHD Graphics 510
Stream Processors (SP)512--
Shading Units--96
Compute Units (CU)8--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)3212
Render Output Units (ROP)162
Ray Accelerators8--
Core Clock Speed800 MHz350 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)2,599 MHz950 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon 760MHD Graphics 510
Pixel Fill Rate41.58 GPixel/s1.9 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate83.17 GTexel/s11.4 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance5.32 TFLOPS182.4 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance332.7 GFLOPS45.6 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon 760MHD Graphics 510
DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
OpenCL2.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.86.4

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.