AMD Radeon 680M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

VS
Performance
Radeon 680M327% better
10,37110% of 104,598
Quadro K3000M
2,4272% of 104,598

The Radeon 680M has 327% better performance than the Quadro K3000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon 680M
No data available
Quadro K3000M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon 680M and the Quadro K3000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon 680M
Shop Quadro K3000M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon 680M GPU

The AMD Radeon 680M is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2022. It is built on the RDNA 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Rembrandt) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 680M includes 768 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 2,000 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,200 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 12 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The 680M has the 176th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 9.92% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro K3000M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2012. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK104) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The K3000M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 700 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 89.6 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The K3000M includes 576 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 654 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 654 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The K3000M has the 330th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.32% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon 680MQuadro K3000M
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0Kepler
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2022Q2 2012
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24
Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Display FPS for Alan Wake 2
Alan Wake 2
Display FPS for Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Display FPS for Total War: PHARAOH
Total War: PHARAOH
Display FPS for Assassin's Creed Mirage
Assassin's Creed Mirage

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 24
F1 24
Radeon 680MQuadro K3000M
Low - 1080p
55 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
46 FPS
--
High - 1080p
34 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
7 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 680M orQuadro K3000M
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce MX45013.4+81%
RTX A500 Mobile11.7+58%
Radeon 680M7.41
Radeon 660M5.6-24%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 680M orQuadro K3000M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon 680M327% better
10,37110% of 104,598
Quadro K3000M
2,4272% of 104,598

The Radeon 680M has 327% better performance than the Quadro K3000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon 680M is ranked 176th with a score of 10,371, and the Quadro K3000M is ranked 330th with a score of 2,427.

Performance per dollar
Radeon 680M
No data available
Quadro K3000M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon 680M and the Quadro K3000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 680M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon Pro Vega 1610,569+2%
T600 Mobile10,498+1%
Radeon 680M10,371
Quadro M4000M10,259-1%
GeForce MX55010,005-4%
Radeon HD 6950M2,452-76%
Quadro K620M2,434-77%
Quadro K3000M2,427-77%
FirePro M60002,422-77%
GeForce 940M2,405.5-77%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 680M orQuadro K3000M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon 680MQuadro K3000M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
2,303
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
2,580
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
43,225
--
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
6,865
--
3DMark 11 Performance Score
10,326
(+273.18%)
2,767
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
144.6
--
PassMark G3D Mark
--
1,638
PassMark G2D Mark
--
340
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon 680MQuadro K3000M
CodenameRembrandtGK104
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0Kepler
Process Size6 nm28 nm
Transistors13,100 million3,540 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon 680MQuadro K3000M
Memory SizeSystem Shared2 GB
Memory TypeSystem SharedGDDR5
Memory BandwidthSystem Dependent89.6 Gb/s
Memory ClockSystem Shared700 MHz
Memory InterfaceSystem Shared256 bit
L1 Cache128 KB16 KB
L2 Cache2 MB512 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon 680MQuadro K3000M
Bus InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8MXM-B (3.0)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)50 W75 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon 680MQuadro K3000M
Stream Processors (SP)768--
CUDA Cores--576
Compute Units (CU)12--
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--3
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)4848
Render Output Units (ROP)3232
Ray Accelerators12--
Core Clock Speed2,000 MHz654 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)2,200 MHz654 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon 680MQuadro K3000M
Pixel Fill Rate70.4 GPixel/s7.85 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate105.6 GTexel/s31.39 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance3.38 TFLOPS753.4 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance211.2 GFLOPS31.39 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon 680MQuadro K3000M
DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_0)
OpenCL2.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.86.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.