Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Radeon 680M
10,37110% of 104,598
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER622% better
74,83472% of 104,598
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 622% better performance than the Radeon 680M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Radeon 680M
No data available
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
93.6658% of 161.45
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 58% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Shop Radeon 680M
Shop GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the AMD Radeon 680M GPU
The AMD Radeon 680M is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2022. It is built on the RDNA 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Rembrandt) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The 680M includes 768 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 2,000 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,200 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 12 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The 680M has the 176th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 9.92% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q1 2024 with a MSRP of $799. It is built on the Ada Lovelace GPU microarchitecture (codename AD103) and is manufactured on a 5 nm process.
Memory
The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory, with a 1,313 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 672.3 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER includes 8,448 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 2,340 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,610 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 264 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 96 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 264 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 66 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a large graphics card, occupying 3 PCIe 4.0 x16 expansion slots. It supports HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. With a thermal design power (TDP) of 285 W and a large, 3-slot size, it is recommended to use a power supply of 600 W and a case with sufficient space to accommodate the card. Compare your card's model and your case's dimensions to verify compatibility.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has the 7th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 71.54% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 74,834 score and $799 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 93.66. This is the 23rd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon 680M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q1 2022 | Q1 2024 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | -- | $799 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
F1 24
Sons of the Forest
Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 (2023)
Alan Wake 2
Lords of the Fallen (2023)
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
F1 24 | Radeon 680M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | 55 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | 46 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | 34 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 7 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 680M orGeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce MX450 | 13.4 | +81% |
| RTX A500 Mobile | 11.7 | +58% |
| Radeon 680M | 7.41 | |
| Radeon 660M | 5.6 | -24% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 680M orGeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Radeon 680M
10,37110% of 104,598
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER622% better
74,83472% of 104,598
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 622% better performance than the Radeon 680M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon 680M is ranked 176th with a score of 10,371, and the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is ranked 7th with a score of 74,834.
Performance per dollar
Radeon 680M
No data available
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
93.6658% of 161.45
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 143% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 93.66 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 680M or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 7900 XT | 75,896 | +632% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | 75,612 | +629% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | 74,834 | +622% |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | 72,227.5 | +596% |
| GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | 69,481 | +570% |
| Radeon Pro Vega 16 | 10,569 | +2% |
| T600 Mobile | 10,498 | +1% |
| Radeon 680M | 10,371 | |
| Quadro M4000M | 10,259 | -1% |
| GeForce MX550 | 10,005 | -4% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 680M orGeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 6600 XT | 103.04 | +10% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | 100.12 | +7% |
| Radeon RX 6800 | 95.14 | +2% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 95.09 | +2% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | 94.63 | +1% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | 93.66 | |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | 87.14 | -7% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16 GB) | 86.4 | -8% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 | 86.18 | -8% |
| Radeon RX 7900 XT | 84.42 | -10% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon 680M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 2,303 | 23,695 (+928.88%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2,580 | 23,540 (+812.4%) |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 43,225 | 165,604 (+283.12%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 6,865 | 52,738 (+668.22%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | -- | 209,177 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 10,326 | 54,278 (+425.64%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 144.6 | 317 (+119.23%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | -- | 31,687 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | -- | 1,185 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon 680M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Rembrandt | AD103 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Size | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistors | 13,100 million | 45,900 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon 680M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | System Shared | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 672.3 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | System Shared | 1,313 MHz |
| Memory Interface | System Shared | 256 bit |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon 680M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | -- | 3 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 W | 285 W |
| Suggested PSU | -- | 600 W |
| Power Connectors | -- | 1x 16-pin |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon 680M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 768 | -- |
| CUDA Cores | -- | 8,448 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 12 | -- |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | -- | 66 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 48 | 264 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 32 | 96 |
| Tensor Cores | -- | 264 |
| Ray Accelerators | 12 | -- |
| Ray Tracing Cores | -- | 66 |
| Core Clock Speed | 2,000 MHz | 2,340 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 2,200 MHz | 2,610 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon 680M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 70.4 GPixel/s | 250.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 105.6 GTexel/s | 689 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 3.38 TFLOPS | 44.1 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | 689 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon 680M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.7 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.