AMD Radeon 680M vs Intel Arc A350M

VS
Performance
Radeon 680M
10,37110% of 104,598
Arc A350M3% better
10,73010% of 104,598

The Arc A350M has 3% better performance than the Radeon 680M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon 680M
No data available
Arc A350M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon 680M and the Arc A350M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon 680M
Shop Arc A350M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon 680M GPU

The AMD Radeon 680M is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2022. It is built on the RDNA 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Rembrandt) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 680M includes 768 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 2,000 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,200 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 12 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The 680M has the 176th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 9.92% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the Intel Arc A350M GPU

The Intel Arc A350M is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2022. It is built on the Generation 12.7 GPU microarchitecture (codename DG2-128) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.

Memory

The Arc A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,750 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 112 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Arc A350M includes 768 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,150 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,200 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 24 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 96 Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX) optimized for AI workloads and 6 ray tracing units dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 25 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Arc A350M has the 173rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 10.26% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon 680MArc A350M
ManufacturerAMDIntel
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0Generation 12.7
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2022Q1 2022
Production StatusActiveActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24
Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Display FPS for Alan Wake 2
Alan Wake 2
Display FPS for Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Display FPS for Total War: PHARAOH
Total War: PHARAOH
Display FPS for Assassin's Creed Mirage
Assassin's Creed Mirage

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 24
F1 24
Radeon 680MArc A350M
Low - 1080p
55 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
46 FPS
--
High - 1080p
34 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
7 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 680M orArc A350M
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce MX45013.4+81%
RTX A500 Mobile11.7+58%
Radeon 680M7.41
Radeon 660M5.6-24%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 680M orArc A350M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon 680M
10,37110% of 104,598
Arc A350M3% better
10,73010% of 104,598

The Arc A350M has 3% better performance than the Radeon 680M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon 680M is ranked 176th with a score of 10,371, and the Arc A350M is ranked 173rd with a score of 10,730.

Performance per dollar
Radeon 680M
No data available
Arc A350M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon 680M and the Arc A350M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 680M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon HD 7970M X211,119+7%
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q11,082.5+7%
RTX A500 Mobile10,818+4%
Arc A350M10,730+3%
Radeon Pro Vega 1610,569+2%
T600 Mobile10,498+1%
Radeon 680M10,371
Quadro M4000M10,259-1%
GeForce MX55010,005-4%
GeForce GTX 970M9,877.5-5%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 680M orArc A350M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon 680MArc A350M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
2,303
3,050
(+32.44%)
3DMark Time Spy Score
2,580
3,397
(+31.67%)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
43,225
(+19.03%)
36,314.5
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
6,865
7,147
(+4.11%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
10,326
10,766
(+4.26%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
144.6
149.3
(+3.25%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon 680MArc A350M
CodenameRembrandtDG2-128
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0Generation 12.7
Process Size6 nm6 nm
Transistors13,100 million7,200 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon 680MArc A350M
Memory SizeSystem Shared4 GB
Memory TypeSystem SharedGDDR6
Memory BandwidthSystem Dependent112 Gb/s
Memory ClockSystem Shared1,750 MHz
Memory InterfaceSystem Shared64 bit
L1 Cache128 KB1.1 MB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon 680MArc A350M
Bus InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)50 W25 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon 680MArc A350M
Stream Processors (SP)768--
Shading Units--768
Compute Units (CU)12--
Execution Units (EU)--6
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)4848
Render Output Units (ROP)3224
Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX)--96
Ray Accelerators12--
Ray Tracing Units (RTU)--6
Core Clock Speed2,000 MHz1,150 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)2,200 MHz2,200 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon 680MArc A350M
Pixel Fill Rate70.4 GPixel/s52.8 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate105.6 GTexel/s105.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance3.38 TFLOPS3.38 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance211.2 GFLOPS844.8 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon 680MArc A350M
DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL2.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.86.6

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.