AMD Radeon 680M vs AMD Radeon 820M
The Radeon 680M has 165% better performance than the Radeon 820M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon 680M and the Radeon 820M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the AMD Radeon 680M GPU
The AMD Radeon 680M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2022. It is built on the RDNA 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Rembrandt) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The 680M includes 768 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 2,000 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,200 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 12 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The 680M has the 200th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 572 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.99% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090.
About the AMD Radeon 820M GPU
The Radeon 820M is a graphics card by AMD. It is built on the RDNA 3+ GPU microarchitecture.
Memory
GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The 820M includes 128 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. Additionally, the GPU features 2 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Benchmark Performance
The 820M has the 304th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 572 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.02% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon 680M | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 3+ |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q1 2022 | -- |
| Production Status | End-of-life | -- |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Space Marine 2 | Radeon 680M | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 8 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 6 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 6 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | 72 | +1,197% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | 71 | +1,179% |
| Radeon 820M | 5.55 | |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The Radeon 680M has 165% better performance than the Radeon 820M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon 680M is ranked 200th with a score of 10,371, and the Radeon 820M is ranked 304th with a score of 3,913.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon 680M and the Radeon 820M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon Pro Vega 16 | 10,569 | +2% |
| T600 Mobile | 10,498 | +1% |
| Radeon 680M | 10,371 | |
| Quadro M4000M | 10,259 | -1% |
| GeForce MX550 | 10,005 | -4% |
| GeForce GTX 765M | 4,019 | -61% |
| GeForce GTX 675MX | 3,978.5 | -62% |
| Radeon 820M | 3,913 | -62% |
| Quadro M620 | 3,801 | -63% |
| Radeon R9 M370X (Mac Edition) | 3,637.5 | -65% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon 680M | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 2,313 (+194.27%) | 786 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2,594.5 (+188.28%) | 900 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 43,193.5 (+89.7%) | 22,769 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 6,856.5 (+117.32%) | 3,155 |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | 29,891 | -- |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 10,326 (+141.04%) | 4,284 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 144.1 (+38.96%) | 103.7 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 3,717 (+71.53%) | 2,167 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 618 | 739 (+19.58%) |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon 680M | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Rembrandt | -- |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 3+ |
| Process Size | 6 nm | -- |
| Transistors | 13,100 million | -- |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon 680M | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | System Shared | -- |
| Memory Type | System Shared | -- |
| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | -- |
| Memory Clock | System Shared | 7,500 MHz |
| Memory Interface | System Shared | -- |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | -- |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | -- |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon 680M | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | -- |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 W | -- |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | -- |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon 680M | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 768 | 128 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 12 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 48 | -- |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 32 | -- |
| Ray Accelerators | 12 | 2 |
| Core Clock Speed | 2,000 MHz | -- |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 2,200 MHz | 2,900 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon 680M | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 70.4 GPixel/s | -- |
| Texture Fill Rate | 105.6 GTexel/s | -- |
| FP32 Performance | 3.38 TFLOPS | -- |
| FP64 Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | -- |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon 680M | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | -- |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | -- |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | -- |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | -- |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.