AMD Radeon 660M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

VS
Performance
Radeon 660M
6,7436% of 104,598
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile349% better
30,26229% of 104,598

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has 349% better performance than the Radeon 660M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon 660M
No data available
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon 660M and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon 660M
Shop RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon 660M GPU

The AMD Radeon 660M is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2022. It is built on the RDNA 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Rembrandt) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 660M includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,500 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,900 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 6 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 40 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The 660M has the 223rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 6.45% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile GPU

The NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2023. It is built on the Ada Lovelace GPU microarchitecture (codename AD107) and is manufactured on a 5 nm process.

Memory

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 2,000 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 256 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile includes 3,072 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,635 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,115 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 96 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 48 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 96 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 24 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has the 74th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 28.93% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon 660MRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0Ada Lovelace
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2022Q1 2023
Production StatusActiveActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24
Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Baldur's Gate 3
Baldur's Gate 3
Display FPS for F1 23
F1 23
Display FPS for Riders Republic
Riders Republic
Display FPS for Diablo 4
Diablo 4
Display FPS for Far Cry 6
Far Cry 6

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 24
F1 24
Radeon 660MRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Low - 1080p
35 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
30 FPS
--
High - 1080p
23 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
6 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 660M orRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce MX45013.4+139%
Radeon 680M7.41+32%
Radeon 660M5.6

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 660M orRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon 660M
6,7436% of 104,598
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile349% better
30,26229% of 104,598

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has 349% better performance than the Radeon 660M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon 660M is ranked 223rd with a score of 6,743, and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is ranked 74th with a score of 30,262.

Performance per dollar
Radeon 660M
No data available
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon 660M and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 660M or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 660M orRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon 660MRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1,544
8,433
(+446.18%)
3DMark Time Spy Score
1,714.5
8,849
(+416.13%)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
31,514.5
--
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
4,848
22,039
(+354.6%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
7,067
27,558
(+289.95%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
121.3
295
(+143.2%)
PassMark G3D Mark
--
15,579
PassMark G2D Mark
--
602
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon 660MRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
CodenameRembrandtAD107
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0Ada Lovelace
Process Size6 nm5 nm
Transistors13,100 million18,900 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon 660MRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Memory SizeSystem Shared8 GB
Memory TypeSystem SharedGDDR6
Memory BandwidthSystem Dependent256 Gb/s
Memory ClockSystem Shared2,000 MHz
Memory InterfaceSystem Shared128 bit
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache2 MB12 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon 660MRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Bus InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)40 W50 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon 660MRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Stream Processors (SP)384--
CUDA Cores--3,072
Compute Units (CU)6--
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--24
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)2496
Render Output Units (ROP)1648
Tensor Cores--96
Ray Accelerators6--
Ray Tracing Cores--24
Core Clock Speed1,500 MHz1,635 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,900 MHz2,115 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon 660MRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Pixel Fill Rate30.4 GPixel/s101.5 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate45.6 GTexel/s203 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1,459 GFLOPS12.99 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance91.2 GFLOPS203 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon 660MRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL2.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.86.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.