AMD Radeon 660M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350

VS
Performance
Radeon 660M9% better
6,7436% of 104,598
GeForce MX350
6,1666% of 104,598

The Radeon 660M has 9% better performance than the GeForce MX350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon 660M
No data available
GeForce MX350
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon 660M and the GeForce MX350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon 660M
Shop GeForce MX350
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon 660M GPU

The AMD Radeon 660M is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2022. It is built on the RDNA 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Rembrandt) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 660M includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,500 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,900 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 6 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 40 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The 660M has the 223rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 6.45% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce MX350 GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce MX350 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2020. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP107S) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The MX350 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,752 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 56.06 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The MX350 includes 640 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,354 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,468 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 20 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The MX350 has the 227th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.89% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon 660MGeForce MX350
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0Pascal
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2022Q1 2020
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24
Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Ready or Not
Ready or Not
Display FPS for The Finals
The Finals
Display FPS for Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora
Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora
Display FPS for EA Sports WRC
EA Sports WRC
Display FPS for Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Lords of the Fallen (2023)

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 24
F1 24
Radeon 660MGeForce MX350
Low - 1080p
35 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
30 FPS
--
High - 1080p
23 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
6 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 660M orGeForce MX350
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce MX45013.4+139%
Radeon 680M7.41+32%
Radeon 660M5.6

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 660M orGeForce MX350
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon 660M9% better
6,7436% of 104,598
GeForce MX350
6,1666% of 104,598

The Radeon 660M has 9% better performance than the GeForce MX350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon 660M is ranked 223rd with a score of 6,743, and the GeForce MX350 is ranked 227th with a score of 6,166.

Performance per dollar
Radeon 660M
No data available
GeForce MX350
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon 660M and the GeForce MX350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 660M or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 660M orGeForce MX350
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon 660MGeForce MX350
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1,544
(+15.61%)
1,335.5
3DMark Time Spy Score
1,714.5
(+14.99%)
1,491
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
31,514.5
(+27.36%)
24,744
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
4,848
(+10.91%)
4,371
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
--
17,916
3DMark 11 Performance Score
7,067
(+10.84%)
6,376
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
121.3
(+10.27%)
110
PassMark G3D Mark
--
2,805
PassMark G2D Mark
--
238
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon 660MGeForce MX350
CodenameRembrandtGP107S
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0Pascal
Process Size6 nm14 nm
Transistors13,100 million3,300 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon 660MGeForce MX350
Memory SizeSystem Shared2 GB
Memory TypeSystem SharedGDDR5
Memory BandwidthSystem Dependent56.06 Gb/s
Memory ClockSystem Shared1,752 MHz
Memory InterfaceSystem Shared64 bit
L1 Cache128 KB48 KB
L2 Cache2 MB512 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon 660MGeForce MX350
Bus InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x4
Thermal Design Power (TDP)40 W20 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon 660MGeForce MX350
Stream Processors (SP)384--
CUDA Cores--640
Compute Units (CU)6--
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--5
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)2432
Render Output Units (ROP)1616
Ray Accelerators6--
Core Clock Speed1,500 MHz1,354 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,900 MHz1,468 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon 660MGeForce MX350
Pixel Fill Rate30.4 GPixel/s23.49 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate45.6 GTexel/s46.98 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1,459 GFLOPS1.88 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance91.2 GFLOPS58.72 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon 660MGeForce MX350
DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
OpenCL2.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.86.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.