AMD Radeon 530 vs Intel Iris Xe MAX

VS
Performance
Radeon 530
2,3272% of 104,598
Iris Xe MAX253% better
8,2148% of 104,598

The Iris Xe MAX has 253% better performance than the Radeon 530 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon 530
No data available
Iris Xe MAX
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon 530 and the Iris Xe MAX for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon 530
Shop Iris Xe MAX
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon 530 GPU

The AMD Radeon 530 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2017. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Weston) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The 530 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 28.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 530 includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 730 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 891 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The 530 has the 341st best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.22% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the Intel Iris Xe MAX GPU

The Intel Iris Xe MAX is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q4 2020. It is built on the Generation 12.1 GPU microarchitecture (codename DG1) and is manufactured on a 10 nm process.

Memory

The Iris Xe MAX has 4 GB of LPDDR4X memory, with a 2,133 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 68.26 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Iris Xe MAX includes 768 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,650 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 24 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Intel recommends a power supply of at least 200 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 25 W.

Benchmark Performance

The Iris Xe MAX has the 203rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.85% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon 530Iris Xe MAX
ManufacturerAMDIntel
ArchitectureGCN 3.0Generation 12.1
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2017Q4 2020
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Crysis Remastered
Crysis Remastered
Display FPS for Monster Hunter Stories 2: Wings of Ruin
Monster Hunter Stories 2
Display FPS for Outriders
Outriders
Display FPS for Hitman 3
Hitman 3
Display FPS for Cyberpunk 2077 (1.0)
Cyberpunk 2077 (1.0)
Display FPS for Immortals Fenyx Rising
Immortals Fenyx Rising
Display FPS for Yakuza: Like a Dragon
Yakuza: Like a Dragon

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Crysis Remastered
Crysis Remastered
Radeon 530Iris Xe MAX
Low - 720p
--
87 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
33 FPS
High - 1080p
--
10 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 530 orIris Xe MAX
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce MX45015+44%
Radeon 680M12.9+24%
GeForce MX35012+15%
GeForce MX33011.9+14%
Radeon 660M10.9+5%
Iris Xe MAX10.4
GeForce MX2508.23-21%
Radeon RX 560X Mobile7.94-24%
GeForce MX1305.81-44%
Radeon RX 550 Mobile3.58-66%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 530 orIris Xe MAX
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon 530
2,3272% of 104,598
Iris Xe MAX253% better
8,2148% of 104,598

The Iris Xe MAX has 253% better performance than the Radeon 530 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon 530 is ranked 341st with a score of 2,327, and the Iris Xe MAX is ranked 203rd with a score of 8,214.

Performance per dollar
Radeon 530
No data available
Iris Xe MAX
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon 530 and the Iris Xe MAX for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 530 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Quadro M3000M8,288.5+256%
GeForce MX4508,250+255%
Iris Xe MAX8,214+253%
Radeon RX 560X Mobile8,211.5+253%
Quadro P2000 Mobile8,148+250%
Radeon HD 8850M2,349+1%
GeForce 840M2,340+1%
Radeon 5302,327
FirePro W4170M2,315-1%
GeForce GT 745M2,249-3%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon 530 orIris Xe MAX
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon 530Iris Xe MAX
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
443
1,743
(+293.45%)
3DMark Time Spy Score
497
1,876
(+277.46%)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
9,210
36,993
(+301.66%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,542
6,333
(+310.7%)
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
--
20,649.5
3DMark 11 Performance Score
2,508
8,024
(+219.94%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
44.5
105
(+135.96%)
PassMark G3D Mark
1,020
1,972
(+93.33%)
PassMark G2D Mark
177
308
(+74.01%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
17
--
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
14.1
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon 530Iris Xe MAX
CodenameWestonDG1
ArchitectureGCN 3.0Generation 12.1
Process Size28 nm10 nm
Transistors1,550 million--

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon 530Iris Xe MAX
Memory Size2 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5LPDDR4X
Memory Bandwidth28.8 Gb/s68.26 Gb/s
Memory Clock900 MHz2,133 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit128 bit
L1 Cache16 KB--
L2 Cache128 KB1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon 530Iris Xe MAX
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)50 W25 W
Suggested PSU--200 W
OutputsDevice DependentNo outputs

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon 530Iris Xe MAX
Stream Processors (SP)384--
Shading Units--768
Compute Units (CU)6--
Execution Units (EU)--96
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)2448
Render Output Units (ROP)824
Core Clock Speed730 MHz300 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)891 MHz1,650 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon 530Iris Xe MAX
Pixel Fill Rate7.13 GPixel/s39.6 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate21.38 GTexel/s79.2 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance684.3 GFLOPS2.53 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance42.77 GFLOPS633.6 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon 530Iris Xe MAX
DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
OpenCL2.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.56.6

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.