Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
FirePro W7170M
9,7089% of 104,737
Radeon R9 38026% better
12,19112% of 104,737
The Radeon R9 380 has 26% better performance than the FirePro W7170M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
FirePro W7170M
No data available
Radeon R9 380
61.2638% of 161.45
The Radeon R9 380 has 38% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Shop FirePro W7170M
Shop Radeon R9 380
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the AMD FirePro W7170M GPU
The AMD FirePro W7170M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q4 2015. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Amethyst) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The FirePro W7170M has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,250 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 160 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The FirePro W7170M includes 2,048 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 723 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 128 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 100 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The FirePro W7170M has the 183rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 9.27% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD Radeon R9 380 GPU
The AMD Radeon R9 380 is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q2 2015 with a MSRP of $199. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Antigua) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The R9 380 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,375 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 176 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The R9 380 includes 1,792 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 970 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 112 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The R9 380 occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 450 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 190 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The R9 380 has the 160th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 11.64% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 12,191 score and $199 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 61.26. This is the 53rd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | FirePro W7170M | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q4 2015 | Q2 2015 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | -- | $199 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
The Witcher 3
BioShock Infinite
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
The Witcher 3 | FirePro W7170M | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | 97 FPS | 144 FPS(+48.76%) |
| Medium - 768p | 72 FPS | 90 FPS(+24.44%) |
| High - 1080p | 31 FPS | 51 FPS(+65.48%) |
| Ultra - 1080p | 23 FPS | 30 FPS(+30%) |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | 19 FPS |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:FirePro W7170M orRadeon R9 380
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB) | 29 | +57% |
| Radeon R9 290X | 28.4 | +54% |
| Radeon RX 570 | 27.7 | +50% |
| Radeon RX 480 | 27.2 | +47% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 26 | +41% |
| Radeon R9 380 | 18.5 | |
| GeForce GTX 680 | 16 | -14% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 | 15.3 | -17% |
| GeForce GTX 950 | 12.7 | -31% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:FirePro W7170M orRadeon R9 380
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 570 | 6.1 | -43% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 | 6.8 | -37% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 | 7.12 | -34% |
| Radeon RX 480 | 8.42 | -22% |
| GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB) | 10.31 | -4% |
| Radeon R9 380 | 10.76 | |
| GeForce GTX 970 | 11.31 | +5% |
| GeForce GTX 950 | 12.52 | +16% |
| Radeon R9 390X | 14.74 | +37% |
| Radeon R9 FURY | 15.29 | +42% |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
FirePro W7170M
9,7089% of 104,737
Radeon R9 38026% better
12,19112% of 104,737
The Radeon R9 380 has 26% better performance than the FirePro W7170M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The FirePro W7170M is ranked 183rd with a score of 9,708, and the Radeon R9 380 is ranked 160th with a score of 12,191.
Performance per dollar
FirePro W7170M
No data available
Radeon R9 380
61.2638% of 161.45
The Radeon R9 380 has 94% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
Radeon R9 380's 61.26 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:FirePro W7170M or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 15,619 | +61% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 13,645 | +41% |
| Radeon R9 380 | 12,191 | +26% |
| Radeon R9 280X | 10,792 | +11% |
| GeForce GTX 960 | 10,767.5 | +11% |
| GeForce MX550 | 10,005 | +3% |
| GeForce GTX 970M | 9,877.5 | +2% |
| FirePro W7170M | 9,708 | |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | 9,615.5 | -1% |
| Radeon R9 M390X | 9,448 | -3% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:FirePro W7170M orRadeon R9 380
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 91.58 | +49% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 | 78.63 | +28% |
| Radeon RX 480 | 78.25 | +28% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 | 77.83 | +27% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 68.01 | +11% |
| Radeon R9 380 | 61.26 | |
| GeForce GT 1030 | 59.84 | -2% |
| GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB) | 58.2 | -5% |
| Radeon R7 370 | 57.17 | -7% |
| GeForce GTX 960 | 54.11 | -12% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | FirePro W7170M | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 43,124 | 50,723 (+17.62%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 6,935 | 8,218 (+18.5%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 9,580 | 11,264 (+17.58%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 102.8 | -- |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 3,162 | 6,140 (+94.18%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 413 | 661 (+60.05%) |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 76.9 | -- |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL | 59.3 | -- |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | FirePro W7170M | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Amethyst | Antigua |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 5,000 million | 5,000 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | FirePro W7170M | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 Gb/s | 176 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,250 MHz | 1,375 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 16 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | FirePro W7170M | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | -- | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 W | 190 W |
| Suggested PSU | -- | 450 W |
| Power Connectors | -- | 2x 6-pin |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | DVI, HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | FirePro W7170M | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 2,048 | 1,792 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 32 | 28 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 128 | 112 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 32 | 32 |
| Core Clock Speed | 723 MHz | 970 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | FirePro W7170M | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 23.14 GPixel/s | 31.04 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 92.54 GTexel/s | 108.6 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 2.96 TFLOPS | 3.48 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 185.1 GFLOPS | 217.3 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | FirePro W7170M | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.