Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
FirePro W4190M
2,3512% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M27539% better
3,2613% of 104,598
The Radeon R9 M275 has 39% better performance than the FirePro W4190M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
FirePro W4190M
No data available
Radeon R9 M275
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the FirePro W4190M and the Radeon R9 M275 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Shop FirePro W4190M
Shop Radeon R9 M275
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the AMD FirePro W4190M GPU
The AMD FirePro W4190M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q4 2015. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Opal) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The FirePro W4190M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,000 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The FirePro W4190M includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 825 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 900 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Benchmark Performance
The FirePro W4190M has the 338th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.25% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD Radeon R9 M275 GPU
The AMD Radeon R9 M275 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2014. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Venus) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The R9 M275 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,000 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The R9 M275 includes 640 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 900 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 925 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Benchmark Performance
The R9 M275 has the 290th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.12% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | FirePro W4190M | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q4 2015 | Q1 2014 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rocket League
The Witcher 3
GTA V
BioShock Infinite
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Rise of the Tomb Raider | FirePro W4190M | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 768p | 26 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 768p | 16 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | 9 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 8 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD | -- | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:FirePro W4190M orRadeon R9 M275
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce 940MX | 11 | +39% |
| GeForce MX110 | 9.1 | +15% |
| GeForce GT 750M | 9 | +14% |
| Radeon 530 | 8.5 | +8% |
| GeForce 940M | 8 | +1% |
| FirePro W4190M | 7.9 | |
| GeForce 930M | 7.7 | -3% |
| Radeon R7 M445 | 6.7 | -15% |
| Radeon R7 M440 | 3.5 | -56% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:FirePro W4190M orRadeon R9 M275
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
FirePro W4190M
2,3512% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M27539% better
3,2613% of 104,598
The Radeon R9 M275 has 39% better performance than the FirePro W4190M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The FirePro W4190M is ranked 338th with a score of 2,351, and the Radeon R9 M275 is ranked 290th with a score of 3,261.
Performance per dollar
FirePro W4190M
No data available
Radeon R9 M275
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the FirePro W4190M and the Radeon R9 M275 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:FirePro W4190M or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon R9 M375 | 3,314 | +41% |
| GeForce 945M | 3,309.5 | +41% |
| Radeon R9 M275 | 3,261 | +39% |
| Radeon HD 6990M | 3,227 | +37% |
| GeForce GTX 675M | 3,218 | +37% |
| GeForce GTX 660M | 2,369 | +1% |
| Quadro M500M | 2,364.5 | +1% |
| FirePro W4190M | 2,351 | |
| Radeon HD 8850M | 2,349 | -0% |
| GeForce 840M | 2,340 | -0% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:FirePro W4190M orRadeon R9 M275
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | FirePro W4190M | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 12,317 (+7.49%) | 11,459 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 1,745 | 1,885 (+8.02%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 2,570 | 3,182 (+23.81%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 48.7 | 50.5 (+3.7%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 1,151 (+3.23%) | 1,115 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 179 | 561 (+213.41%) |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | FirePro W4190M | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Opal | Venus |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 950 million | 1,500 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | FirePro W4190M | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 64 Gb/s | 64 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,000 MHz | 1,000 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 16 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | FirePro W4190M | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | FirePro W4190M | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 384 | 640 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 6 | 10 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 24 | 40 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 8 | 16 |
| Core Clock Speed | 825 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 900 MHz | 925 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | FirePro W4190M | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 7.2 GPixel/s | 14.8 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 21.6 GTexel/s | 37 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 691.2 GFLOPS | 1,184 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 43.2 GFLOPS | 74 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | FirePro W4190M | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 (1.2) | 2.1 (1.2) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 6.5 (5.1) |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.