AMD FirePro W4170M vs AMD Radeon Pro 560X

VS
Performance
FirePro W4170M
2,3152% of 104,598
Radeon Pro 560X228% better
7,5907% of 104,598

The Radeon Pro 560X has 228% better performance than the FirePro W4170M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
FirePro W4170M
No data available
Radeon Pro 560X
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the FirePro W4170M and the Radeon Pro 560X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop FirePro W4170M
Shop Radeon Pro 560X
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD FirePro W4170M GPU

The AMD FirePro W4170M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2014. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Mars) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The FirePro W4170M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,000 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The FirePro W4170M includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 825 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 900 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Benchmark Performance

The FirePro W4170M has the 342nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.21% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon Pro 560X GPU

The AMD Radeon Pro 560X is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q3 2018. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Polaris 21) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Pro 560X has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,470 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 94.08 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Pro 560X includes 1,024 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,004 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Pro 560X has the 213th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.26% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoFirePro W4170MRadeon Pro 560X
ManufacturerAMDAMD
ArchitectureGCN 1.0GCN 4.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2014Q3 2018
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Doom Eternal
Doom Eternal
Display FPS for Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3
Display FPS for Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Display FPS for Need for Speed Heat
NFS Heat
Display FPS for Red Dead Redemption 2
Red Dead Redemption 2
Display FPS for Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)
Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)
Display FPS for GRID (2019)
GRID (2019)

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Doom Eternal
Doom Eternal
FirePro W4170MRadeon Pro 560X
Low - 720p
--
90 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
46 FPS
High - 1080p
--
29 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
26 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
19 FPS
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:FirePro W4170M orRadeon Pro 560X
GPUFrames Per Second
Radeon RX 6800S150+706%
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile145+680%
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile128.5+591%
Radeon RX 6700S120.8+549%
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q96.6+419%
Radeon Pro 560X18.6

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:FirePro W4170M orRadeon Pro 560X
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
FirePro W4170M
2,3152% of 104,598
Radeon Pro 560X228% better
7,5907% of 104,598

The Radeon Pro 560X has 228% better performance than the FirePro W4170M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The FirePro W4170M is ranked 342nd with a score of 2,315, and the Radeon Pro 560X is ranked 213th with a score of 7,590.

Performance per dollar
FirePro W4170M
No data available
Radeon Pro 560X
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the FirePro W4170M and the Radeon Pro 560X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:FirePro W4170M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce GTX 780M7,776.5+236%
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile7,678.5+232%
Radeon Pro 560X7,590+228%
Quadro M22007,372+218%
GeForce GTX 965M7,322+216%
GeForce 840M2,340+1%
Radeon 5302,327+1%
FirePro W4170M2,315
GeForce GT 745M2,249-3%
Radeon R7 M4402,245-3%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:FirePro W4170M orRadeon Pro 560X
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkFirePro W4170MRadeon Pro 560X
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
1,614
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
1,775
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
12,506
32,449
(+159.47%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,766
5,699
(+222.71%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
2,629
7,910
(+200.87%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
54.7
98.4
(+79.89%)
PassMark G3D Mark
1,033
3,678
(+256.05%)
PassMark G2D Mark
212
722
(+240.57%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
22.4
--
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
17.6
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecFirePro W4170MRadeon Pro 560X
CodenameMarsPolaris 21
ArchitectureGCN 1.0GCN 4.0
Process Size28 nm14 nm
Transistors950 million3,000 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecFirePro W4170MRadeon Pro 560X
Memory Size2 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth64 Gb/s94.08 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,000 MHz1,470 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit128 bit
L1 Cache16 KB16 KB
L2 Cache256 KB1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecFirePro W4170MRadeon Pro 560X
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)--75 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecFirePro W4170MRadeon Pro 560X
Stream Processors (SP)3841,024
Compute Units (CU)616
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)2464
Render Output Units (ROP)816
Core Clock Speed825 MHz1,004 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)900 MHz--

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecFirePro W4170MRadeon Pro 560X
Pixel Fill Rate7.2 GPixel/s16.06 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate21.6 GTexel/s64.26 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance691.2 GFLOPS2.06 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance43.2 GFLOPS128.5 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecFirePro W4170MRadeon Pro 560X
DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_0)
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)2.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.