AMD FirePro M5950 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile has 809% better performance than the FirePro M5950 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the FirePro M5950 and the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the AMD FirePro M5950 GPU
The AMD FirePro M5950 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2011. It is built on the TeraScale 2 GPU microarchitecture (codename Whistler) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.
Memory
The FirePro M5950 has 1,024 MB of GDDR5 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 57.6 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The FirePro M5950 includes 480 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 725 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 35 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The FirePro M5950 has the 420th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.29% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q4 2021. It is built on the Ampere GPU microarchitecture (codename GA107) and is manufactured on a 8 nm process.
Memory
The RTX 2050 Mobile has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,750 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 112 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RTX 2050 Mobile includes 2,048 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 735 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,245 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 64 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 32 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 30 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The RTX 2050 Mobile has the 159th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 11.71% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | FirePro M5950 | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Ampere |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q1 2011 | Q4 2021 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Dragon's Dogma 2 | FirePro M5950 | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 16 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | -- |
| High - 1080p | -- | 15 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 7600M | 49.5 | +241% |
| GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 14.5 | |
| RTX A500 Mobile | 14.5 | +0% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile has 809% better performance than the FirePro M5950 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The FirePro M5950 is ranked 420th with a score of 1,350, and the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is ranked 159th with a score of 12,267.5.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the FirePro M5950 and the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 980M | 12,517 | +827% |
| Radeon Pro Vega 20 | 12,289 | +810% |
| GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 12,267.5 | +809% |
| Quadro P3000 | 12,105 | +797% |
| Arc A370M | 12,089.5 | +796% |
| Radeon HD 8670M | 1,396 | +3% |
| Radeon HD 8730M | 1,370.5 | +2% |
| FirePro M5950 | 1,350 | |
| Radeon HD 7690M XT | 1,346 | -0% |
| Radeon HD 6770M | 1,328 | -2% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | FirePro M5950 | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 3,192.5 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 3,439 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | -- | 58,068 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | -- | 8,880.5 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 1,500 | 12,103 (+706.87%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | -- | 159.8 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 1,314 | 7,690 (+485.24%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 573 (+21.4%) | 472 |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | FirePro M5950 | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Whistler | GA107 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Ampere |
| Process Size | 40 nm | 8 nm |
| Transistors | 716 million | 8,700 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | FirePro M5950 | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 1,024 MB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 57.6 Gb/s | 112 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 900 MHz | 1,750 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 128 bit | 64 bit |
| L1 Cache | 8 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 2 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | FirePro M5950 | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 W | 30 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | DVI, HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | FirePro M5950 | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 480 | -- |
| CUDA Cores | -- | 2,048 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 6 | -- |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | -- | 16 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 24 | 64 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 8 | 32 |
| Tensor Cores | -- | 64 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | -- | 32 |
| Core Clock Speed | 725 MHz | 735 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | -- | 1,245 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | FirePro M5950 | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 5.8 GPixel/s | 39.84 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 17.4 GTexel/s | 79.68 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 696 GFLOPS | 5.1 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | -- | 159.4 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | FirePro M5950 | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.