Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
FirePro M5950
1,3501% of 104,598
Radeon RX 7800 XT4,760% better
65,610.563% of 104,598
The Radeon RX 7800 XT has 4,760% better performance than the FirePro M5950 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
FirePro M5950
No data available
Radeon RX 7800 XT
131.4881% of 161.45
The Radeon RX 7800 XT has 81% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Shop FirePro M5950
Shop Radeon RX 7800 XT
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the AMD FirePro M5950 GPU
The AMD FirePro M5950 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2011. It is built on the TeraScale 2 GPU microarchitecture (codename Whistler) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.
Memory
The FirePro M5950 has 1,024 MB of GDDR5 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 57.6 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The FirePro M5950 includes 480 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 725 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 35 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The FirePro M5950 has the 420th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.29% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT GPU
The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q3 2023 with a MSRP of $499. It is built on the RDNA 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Navi 32) and is manufactured on a 5 nm process.
Memory
The RX 7800 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 2,438 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 624.1 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RX 7800 XT includes 3,840 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,295 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,430 MHz. It usually operates at 2,124 MHz during typical gaming workloads. Complementing the processing units are 240 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 96 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 120 AI accelerators optimized for AI workloads and 60 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The RX 7800 XT occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports HDMI 2.1a, DisplayPort 2.1 display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 600 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 263 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The RX 7800 XT has the 13th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 62.73% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 65,610.5 score and $499 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 131.48. This is the 2nd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | FirePro M5950 | Radeon RX 7800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q1 2011 | Q3 2023 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | -- | $499 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
F1 24
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Ghost of Tsushima
Dragon's Dogma 2
Horizon Forbidden West
Alone in the Dark (2024)
Sons of the Forest
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
F1 24 | FirePro M5950 | Radeon RX 7800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 484 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 422 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 317 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 88 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | 57 FPS |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | 29 FPS |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:FirePro M5950 orRadeon RX 7800 XT
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4080 | 55 | +92% |
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | 46.6 | +62% |
| GeForce RTX 3090 | 40.5 | +41% |
| Radeon RX 7900 XT | 37 | +29% |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | 30.2 | +5% |
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | 28.7 | |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | 28.2 | -2% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 22.2 | -23% |
| Arc A770 | 21.2 | -26% |
| Radeon RX 6800 | 20.6 | -28% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:FirePro M5950 orRadeon RX 7800 XT
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Arc A770 | 15.52 | -11% |
| Arc A750 | 17.2 | -1% |
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | 17.39 | |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 17.97 | +3% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | 21.24 | +22% |
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | 21.44 | +23% |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | 21.8 | +25% |
| Radeon RX 7900 XT | 24.3 | +40% |
| Radeon RX 6800 | 28.11 | +62% |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
FirePro M5950
1,3501% of 104,598
Radeon RX 7800 XT4,760% better
65,610.563% of 104,598
The Radeon RX 7800 XT has 4,760% better performance than the FirePro M5950 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The FirePro M5950 is ranked 420th with a score of 1,350, and the Radeon RX 7800 XT is ranked 13th with a score of 65,610.5.
Performance per dollar
FirePro M5950
No data available
Radeon RX 7800 XT
131.4881% of 161.45
The Radeon RX 7800 XT has 201% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
Radeon RX 7800 XT's 131.48 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:FirePro M5950 or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | 69,481 | +5,047% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | 68,373 | +4,965% |
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | 65,610.5 | +4,760% |
| GeForce RTX 3090 | 61,518 | +4,457% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | 60,980 | +4,417% |
| Radeon HD 8670M | 1,396 | +3% |
| Radeon HD 8730M | 1,370.5 | +2% |
| FirePro M5950 | 1,350 | |
| Radeon HD 7690M XT | 1,346 | -0% |
| Radeon HD 6770M | 1,328 | -2% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:FirePro M5950 orRadeon RX 7800 XT
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 7600 | 161.45 | +23% |
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | 131.48 | |
| Arc A750 | 129.02 | -2% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | 127.73 | -3% |
| Radeon RX 7700 XT | 127.71 | -3% |
| Arc A770 | 125.54 | -5% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) | 119.81 | -9% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | 114.15 | -13% |
| Radeon RX 6600 XT | 103.04 | -22% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | 100.12 | -24% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | FirePro M5950 | Radeon RX 7800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 19,758 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 19,464.5 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | -- | 202,773 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | -- | 49,706.5 |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | -- | 211,478 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 1,500 | 48,888 (+3,159.2%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 1,314 | 24,228 (+1,743.84%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 566 | 1,129 (+99.47%) |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | FirePro M5950 | Radeon RX 7800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Whistler | Navi 32 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Size | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistors | 716 million | 28,100 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | FirePro M5950 | Radeon RX 7800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 1,024 MB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 57.6 Gb/s | 624.1 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 900 MHz | 2,438 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| L1 Cache | 8 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 4 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | FirePro M5950 | Radeon RX 7800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | -- | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 W | 263 W |
| Suggested PSU | -- | 600 W |
| Power Connectors | -- | 2x 8-pin |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | HDMI 2.1a, DisplayPort 2.1 |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | FirePro M5950 | Radeon RX 7800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 480 | 3,840 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 6 | 60 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 24 | 240 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 8 | 96 |
| AI Accelerators | -- | 120 |
| Ray Accelerators | -- | 60 |
| Core Clock Speed | 725 MHz | 1,295 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | -- | 2,430 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Game) | -- | 2,124 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | FirePro M5950 | Radeon RX 7800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 5.8 GPixel/s | 233.3 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 17.4 GTexel/s | 583.2 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 696 GFLOPS | 37.32 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | -- | 1,166 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | FirePro M5950 | Radeon RX 7800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.