AMD FirePro M2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

VS
Performance
FirePro M2000
8411% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q1,218% better
11,082.511% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q has 1,218% better performance than the FirePro M2000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
FirePro M2000
No data available
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the FirePro M2000 and the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop FirePro M2000
Shop GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD FirePro M2000 GPU

The AMD FirePro M2000 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q3 2012. It is built on the TeraScale 2 GPU microarchitecture (codename Turks) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.

Memory

The FirePro M2000 has 1,024 MB of GDDR5 memory, with a 800 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 25.6 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The FirePro M2000 includes 480 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 500 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 33 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The FirePro M2000 has the 478th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.80% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2019. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU117) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 1650 Max-Q has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,751 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 112.1 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 1650 Max-Q includes 1,024 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,020 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,245 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 1650 Max-Q has the 169th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 10.60% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoFirePro M2000GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureTeraScale 2Turing
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ3 2012Q2 2019
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3
Display FPS for Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Display FPS for Need for Speed Heat
NFS Heat
Display FPS for Red Dead Redemption 2
Red Dead Redemption 2
Display FPS for Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)
Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)
Display FPS for GRID (2019)
GRID (2019)
Display FPS for Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Breakpoint
Ghost Recon Breakpoint

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3
FirePro M2000GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Low - 720p
--
95 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
52 FPS
High - 1080p
--
34 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
26 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:FirePro M2000 orGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:FirePro M2000 orGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
FirePro M2000
8411% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q1,218% better
11,082.511% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q has 1,218% better performance than the FirePro M2000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The FirePro M2000 is ranked 478th with a score of 841, and the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is ranked 169th with a score of 11,082.5.

Performance per dollar
FirePro M2000
No data available
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the FirePro M2000 and the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:FirePro M2000 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Quadro T1000 Mobile11,377+1,253%
Radeon HD 7970M X211,119+1,222%
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q11,082.5+1,218%
RTX A500 Mobile10,818+1,186%
Arc A350M10,730+1,176%
Radeon HD 6630M877+4%
Mobility Radeon HD 5650855.5+2%
FirePro M2000841
Radeon HD 7570M829-1%
GeForce GT 435M799-5%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:FirePro M2000 orGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkFirePro M2000GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
3,016
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
3,070
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
--
45,243.5
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
--
7,779
3DMark 11 Performance Score
954
10,471
(+997.59%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
108.1
PassMark G3D Mark
425
6,177
(+1,353.41%)
PassMark G2D Mark
206
329
(+59.71%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecFirePro M2000GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
CodenameTurksTU117
ArchitectureTeraScale 2Turing
Process Size40 nm12 nm
Transistors716 million4,700 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecFirePro M2000GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Memory Size1,024 MB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth25.6 Gb/s112.1 Gb/s
Memory Clock800 MHz1,751 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit128 bit
L1 Cache--64 KB
L2 Cache--1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecFirePro M2000GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Bus InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)33 W50 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecFirePro M2000GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Stream Processors (SP)480--
CUDA Cores--1,024
Compute Units (CU)6--
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--16
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)2464
Render Output Units (ROP)832
Core Clock Speed500 MHz1,020 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--1,245 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecFirePro M2000GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Pixel Fill Rate4 GPixel/s39.84 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate12 GTexel/s79.68 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance480 GFLOPS2.55 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance--79.68 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecFirePro M2000GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
OpenCL1.23.0
OpenGL4.44.6
Shader Model5.06.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.