Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
FirePro M2000
8411% of 104,598
Radeon RX 6950 XT8,488% better
72,227.569% of 104,598
The Radeon RX 6950 XT has 8,488% better performance than the FirePro M2000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
FirePro M2000
No data available
Radeon RX 6950 XT
65.7241% of 161.45
The Radeon RX 6950 XT has 41% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Shop FirePro M2000
Shop Radeon RX 6950 XT
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the AMD FirePro M2000 GPU
The AMD FirePro M2000 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q3 2012. It is built on the TeraScale 2 GPU microarchitecture (codename Turks) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.
Memory
The FirePro M2000 has 1,024 MB of GDDR5 memory, with a 800 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 25.6 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The FirePro M2000 includes 480 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 500 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 33 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The FirePro M2000 has the 478th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.80% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT GPU
The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q2 2022 with a MSRP of $1,099. It is built on the RDNA 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Navi 21) and is manufactured on a 7 nm process.
Memory
The RX 6950 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 2,250 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 576 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RX 6950 XT includes 5,120 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,860 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,310 MHz. It usually operates at 2,100 MHz during typical gaming workloads. Complementing the processing units are 320 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 128 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 80 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The RX 6950 XT is a large graphics card, occupying 3 PCIe 4.0 x16 expansion slots. It supports HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. With a thermal design power (TDP) of 335 W and a large, 3-slot size, it is recommended to use a power supply of 700 W and a case with sufficient space to accommodate the card. Compare your card's model and your case's dimensions to verify compatibility.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The RX 6950 XT has the 8th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 69.05% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 72,227.5 score and $1,099 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 65.72. This is the 48th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | FirePro M2000 | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q3 2012 | Q2 2022 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | -- | $1,099 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
F1 24
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Ghost of Tsushima
Dragon's Dogma 2
Horizon Forbidden West
Alone in the Dark (2024)
Sons of the Forest
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
F1 24 | FirePro M2000 | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 534 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 517 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 407 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 96 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | 62 FPS |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | 30 FPS |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:FirePro M2000 orRadeon RX 6950 XT
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4080 | 55 | +82% |
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | 46.6 | +54% |
| GeForce RTX 3090 | 40.5 | +34% |
| Radeon RX 7900 XT | 37 | +23% |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | 30.2 | |
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | 28.7 | -5% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | 28.2 | -7% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 22.2 | -26% |
| Arc A770 | 21.2 | -30% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:FirePro M2000 orRadeon RX 6950 XT
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | 21.44 | -41% |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | 21.8 | -40% |
| Radeon RX 7900 XT | 24.3 | -33% |
| Radeon RX 6800 | 28.11 | -23% |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | 36.39 | |
| GeForce RTX 3090 | 37.01 | +2% |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
FirePro M2000
8411% of 104,598
Radeon RX 6950 XT8,488% better
72,227.569% of 104,598
The Radeon RX 6950 XT has 8,488% better performance than the FirePro M2000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The FirePro M2000 is ranked 478th with a score of 841, and the Radeon RX 6950 XT is ranked 8th with a score of 72,227.5.
Performance per dollar
FirePro M2000
No data available
Radeon RX 6950 XT
65.7241% of 161.45
The Radeon RX 6950 XT has 100% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
Radeon RX 6950 XT's 65.72 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:FirePro M2000 or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | 75,612 | +8,891% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | 74,834 | +8,798% |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | 72,227.5 | +8,488% |
| GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | 69,481 | +8,162% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | 68,373 | +8,030% |
| Radeon HD 6630M | 877 | +4% |
| Mobility Radeon HD 5650 | 855.5 | +2% |
| FirePro M2000 | 841 | |
| Radeon HD 7570M | 829 | -1% |
| GeForce GT 435M | 799 | -5% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:FirePro M2000 orRadeon RX 6950 XT
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | 83.07 | +26% |
| Radeon RX 6800 XT | 80.19 | +22% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 | 76.84 | +17% |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | 71.95 | +9% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 (12 GB) | 70.88 | +8% |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | 65.72 | |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | 65.41 | -0% |
| Radeon RX 6900 XT | 59.18 | -10% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | 58.6 | -11% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 | 57.62 | -12% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | FirePro M2000 | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 22,004 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 20,574 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | -- | 229,172 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | -- | 59,882 |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | -- | 186,146 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 954 | 48,816.5 (+5,017.03%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 425 | 28,182 (+6,531.06%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 206 | 1,035 (+402.43%) |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | FirePro M2000 | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Turks | Navi 21 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Size | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Transistors | 716 million | 26,800 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | FirePro M2000 | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 1,024 MB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 25.6 Gb/s | 576 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 800 MHz | 2,250 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 64 bit | 256 bit |
| L1 Cache | -- | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | -- | 4 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | FirePro M2000 | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | -- | 3 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 W | 335 W |
| Suggested PSU | -- | 700 W |
| Power Connectors | -- | 2x 8-pin |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | FirePro M2000 | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 480 | 5,120 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 6 | 80 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 24 | 320 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 8 | 128 |
| Ray Accelerators | -- | 80 |
| Core Clock Speed | 500 MHz | 1,860 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | -- | 2,310 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Game) | -- | 2,100 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | FirePro M2000 | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 4 GPixel/s | 295.7 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 12 GTexel/s | 739.2 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 480 GFLOPS | 23.65 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | -- | 1,478 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | FirePro M2000 | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.