Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
FirePro M2000
8411% of 104,598
Radeon R5 M335112% better
1,7842% of 104,598
The Radeon R5 M335 has 112% better performance than the FirePro M2000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
FirePro M2000
No data available
Radeon R5 M335
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the FirePro M2000 and the Radeon R5 M335 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Shop FirePro M2000
Shop Radeon R5 M335
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the AMD FirePro M2000 GPU
The AMD FirePro M2000 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q3 2012. It is built on the TeraScale 2 GPU microarchitecture (codename Turks) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.
Memory
The FirePro M2000 has 1,024 MB of GDDR5 memory, with a 800 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 25.6 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The FirePro M2000 includes 480 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 500 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 33 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The FirePro M2000 has the 478th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.80% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD Radeon R5 M335 GPU
The AMD Radeon R5 M335 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q4 2015. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Exo) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The R5 M335 has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 14.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The R5 M335 includes 320 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,070 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 20 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Benchmark Performance
The R5 M335 has the 380th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.71% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | FirePro M2000 | Radeon R5 M335 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q3 2012 | Q4 2015 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
The Witcher 3
BioShock Infinite
CS: GO
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
The Witcher 3 | FirePro M2000 | Radeon R5 M335 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | -- | 17 FPS |
| Medium - 768p | -- | 11 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 6 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 3 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:FirePro M2000 orRadeon R5 M335
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GT 740M | 4 | +38% |
| GeForce 920M | 4 | +38% |
| Quadro K1100M | 3.7 | +28% |
| Radeon R5 M255 | 3.4 | +17% |
| Radeon R7 M260 | 3.2 | +10% |
| Radeon R5 M335 | 2.9 | |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:FirePro M2000 orRadeon R5 M335
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
FirePro M2000
8411% of 104,598
Radeon R5 M335112% better
1,7842% of 104,598
The Radeon R5 M335 has 112% better performance than the FirePro M2000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The FirePro M2000 is ranked 478th with a score of 841, and the Radeon R5 M335 is ranked 380th with a score of 1,784.
Performance per dollar
FirePro M2000
No data available
Radeon R5 M335
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the FirePro M2000 and the Radeon R5 M335 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:FirePro M2000 or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 560M | 1,820 | +116% |
| Quadro K2000M | 1,798 | +114% |
| Radeon R5 M335 | 1,784 | +112% |
| Radeon R5 M255 | 1,784 | +112% |
| GeForce 825M | 1,756.5 | +109% |
| Radeon HD 6630M | 877 | +4% |
| Mobility Radeon HD 5650 | 855.5 | +2% |
| FirePro M2000 | 841 | |
| Radeon HD 7570M | 829 | -1% |
| GeForce GT 435M | 799 | -5% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:FirePro M2000 orRadeon R5 M335
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | FirePro M2000 | Radeon R5 M335 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | -- | 4,590 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | -- | 911 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 954 | 1,889 (+98.01%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | -- | 30.9 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 425 | 549 (+29.18%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 206 | 578 (+180.58%) |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | FirePro M2000 | Radeon R5 M335 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Turks | Exo |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Size | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 716 million | 690 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | FirePro M2000 | Radeon R5 M335 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 1,024 MB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 25.6 Gb/s | 14.4 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 800 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 64 bit | 64 bit |
| L1 Cache | -- | 16 KB |
| L2 Cache | -- | 128 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | FirePro M2000 | Radeon R5 M335 |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 W | -- |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | FirePro M2000 | Radeon R5 M335 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 480 | 320 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 6 | 5 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 24 | 20 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 8 | 8 |
| Core Clock Speed | 500 MHz | 1,070 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | FirePro M2000 | Radeon R5 M335 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 4 GPixel/s | 8.24 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 12 GTexel/s | 20.6 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 480 GFLOPS | 659.2 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | -- | 41.2 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | FirePro M2000 | Radeon R5 M335 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 (1.2) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.5 (5.1) |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.