AMD FirePro M2000 vs AMD Radeon HD 8750M
The Radeon HD 8750M has 102% better performance than the FirePro M2000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the FirePro M2000 and the Radeon HD 8750M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the AMD FirePro M2000 GPU
The FirePro M2000 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card by AMD. It launched in Q3 2012. Its Turks chip that powers the GPU uses the TeraScale 2 architecture and is fabricated on the 40 nm process.
Memory
This GPU is paired with 1,024 MB of GDDR5 VRAM. Its 800 MHz memory clock and 64 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 25.6 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
Compatibility
This mobile card has a TDP of 33 W.
Benchmark Performance
The FirePro M2000 has the 475th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.80% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD Radeon HD 8750M GPU
The Radeon HD 8750M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card by AMD. It launched in Q1 2013. Its Mars chip that powers the GPU uses the GCN 1.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 28 nm process.
Memory
This GPU is paired with 1,024 MB of GDDR5 VRAM. Its 1,000 MHz memory clock and 128 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 64 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
Benchmark Performance
The Radeon HD 8750M has the 391st highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.62% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8750M |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q3 2012 | Q1 2013 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
BioShock Infinite | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8750M |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | -- | 60 FPS |
| Medium - 768p | -- | 36 FPS |
| High - 768p | -- | 31 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 11 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon R7 M260X | 13.5 | +23% |
| GeForce GT 745M | 13 | +18% |
| GeForce 930M | 13 | +18% |
| GeForce 830M | 12.3 | +12% |
| Radeon R7 M340 | 12 | +9% |
| Radeon HD 8750M | 11 | |
| Radeon R7 M360 | 11 | +0% |
| Radeon R7 M440 | 11 | +0% |
| GeForce 920M | 11 | +0% |
| Quadro K2000M | 10.9 | -1% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The Radeon HD 8750M has 102% better performance than the FirePro M2000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The FirePro M2000 is ranked 475th with a score of 841, and the Radeon HD 8750M is ranked 391st with a score of 1,698.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the FirePro M2000 and the Radeon HD 8750M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce 920M | 1,718.5 | +104% |
| GeForce GT 735M | 1,713 | +104% |
| Radeon HD 8750M | 1,698 | +102% |
| Radeon R5 M330 | 1,689 | +101% |
| Radeon R5 M430 | 1,689 | +101% |
| Radeon HD 6630M | 877 | +4% |
| Mobility Radeon HD 5650 | 855.5 | +2% |
| FirePro M2000 | 841 | |
| Radeon HD 7570M | 829 | -1% |
| GeForce GT 435M | 799 | -5% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8750M |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | -- | 8,524.5 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | -- | 1,276.5 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 954 | 1,863.5 (+95.34%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | -- | 40.2 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 425 | 993 (+133.65%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 204 (+2%) | 200 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | -- | 16.9 |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8750M |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Turks | Mars |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Size | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 716 million | 950 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8750M |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 1,024 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 25.6 Gb/s | 64 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 800 MHz | 1,000 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 64 bit | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | -- | 16 KB |
| L2 Cache | -- | 256 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8750M |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 W | -- |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8750M |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 480 | 384 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 6 | 6 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 24 | 24 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 8 | 8 |
| Core Clock Speed | 500 MHz | 620 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | -- | 775 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8750M |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 4 GPixel/s | 5.36 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 12 GTexel/s | 16.08 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 480 GFLOPS | 514.6 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | -- | 32.16 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8750M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 (1.2) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.5 (5.1) |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.