Intel Xeon W-10885M vs Intel Core i9-13900H
The Core i9-13900H has 22% better performance than the Xeon W-10885M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The Core i9-13900H has 30% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark: Intel Core i5-13400F.
Summary
About the Intel Xeon W-10885M CPU
The Intel Xeon W-10885M is a 8-core (16-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The W-10885M is compatible with FCBGA1440 motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel Processors integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the Xeon W-10885M has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 512 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 16 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Xeon W-10885M features 8 total cores which can process 16 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2400.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 5300.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The Xeon W-10885M includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel Processors. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The Xeon W-10885M has the 88th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 49.48% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
About the Intel Core i9-13900H CPU
The Intel Core i9-13900H is a 14-core (20-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q1 2023 with a suggested retail price of $617. It is part of Intel's Core i9 lineup, which is based on the Raptor Lake-H microarchitecture. The i9-13900H is compatible with Intel BGA 1744 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 10 nm manufacturing process. It features the Iris Xe Graphics 96EU integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
The Core i9-13900H supports DDR4-3200, DDR5-5200 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the Core i9-13900H has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 80 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 24 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Core i9-13900H features 14 total cores which can process 20 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The 14 cores consist of 6 P-Cores and 8 E-Cores. P-Cores are designed for high-performance tasks and E-Cores are intended for efficiency and lighter tasks. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2.6 GHz, and it can boost up to 5.4 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The Core i9-13900H includes an integrated graphics solution called Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The Core i9-13900H has the 52nd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 60.40% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Its 22,343 score and $617 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 36.21. This is the 96th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Perf. Physics benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Xeon W-10885M | Core i9-13900H |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Series | -- | Core i9 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | -- | Q1 2023 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | -- | $617 |
| Production Status | -- | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
The Core i9-13900H has 22% better performance than the Xeon W-10885M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The Xeon W-10885M is ranked 88th with a score of 18,302, and the Core i9-13900H is ranked 52nd with a score of 22,343.
The Core i9-13900H has 68% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
Core i9-13900H's 36.21 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked CPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
| CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Core i9-12900HX | 22,972 | +26% |
| Core i7-12800HX | 22,373 | +22% |
| Core i9-13900H | 22,343 | +22% |
| Core i5-13450HX | 21,982 | +20% |
| Core i7-13620H | 20,532 | +12% |
| Ryzen 9 6900HS | 18,587 | +2% |
| Core i7-12650H | 18,363 | +0% |
| Xeon W-10885M | 18,302 | |
| Ryzen 7 7735HS | 17,941.5 | -2% |
| Ryzen 9 6900HX | 17,908 | -2% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| Core i9-12900HX | 37.91 | +5% |
| Core i9-13980HX | 37.5 | +4% |
| Core i5-1335U | 37.43 | +3% |
| Core i7-1370P | 37.17 | +3% |
| Core i7-10875H | 36.94 | +2% |
| Core i9-13900H | 36.21 | |
| Core i9-13900HX | 35.48 | -2% |
| Core i9-13900HK | 34.61 | -4% |
| Core i9-13905H | 34.28 | -5% |
| Core i9-11900H | 34.22 | -5% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Xeon W-10885M | Core i9-13900H |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 18,302 | 22,343 (+22.08%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy CPU | 8,812 | 11,648 (+32.18%) |
| Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | 1,640 | 2,666.5 (+62.59%) |
| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | 210 | 279 (+32.86%) |
| Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core | 6,876 | 12,611 (+83.41%) |
| Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core | 1,533 | 2,645 (+72.54%) |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 15,660 | 29,060 (+85.57%) |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | 2,773 | 3,857 (+39.09%) |
Technical Specs
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | Xeon W-10885M | Core i9-13900H |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Foundry | -- | Intel |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | Xeon W-10885M | Core i9-13900H |
|---|---|---|
| Series | -- | Core i9 |
| Microarchitecture | -- | Raptor Lake-H |
| Codename | Comet Lake | Raptor Lake-H |
| Memory Support | -- | DDR4-3200, DDR5-5200 |
| Memory Channels | -- | Dual-channel |
| ECC Memory | -- | No |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | Xeon W-10885M | Core i9-13900H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 14 |
| Threads | 16 | 20 |
| Performance Cores (P-cores) | -- | 6 |
| Efficient Cores (E-cores) | -- | 8 |
| Clock Speed | 2400.0 MHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Turbo Clock | 5300.0 MHz | 5.4 GHz |
| P-core Clock | -- | 2.6 GHz |
| P-core Turbo Clock | -- | 5.4 GHz |
| E-core Clock Speed | -- | 1900.0 MHz |
| E-core Turbo Clock | -- | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | -- | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | -- | 26.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | -- | No |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | Xeon W-10885M | Core i9-13900H |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 24 MB |
| E-core L1 Cache | -- | 96 KB |
| E-core L2 Cache | -- | 4 MB |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | Xeon W-10885M | Core i9-13900H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1440 | Intel BGA 1744 |
| PCI Express | -- | PCIe 5.0 x8, PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 W | 45 W |
| Power Limit 1 (PL1) | -- | 45 W |
| Power Limit 2 (PL2) | -- | 115 W |
| Tcase Max | -- | 72 °C |
| TJ Max | -- | 100 °C |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | Xeon W-10885M | Core i9-13900H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel Processors | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU |
| Extensions / Technologies | -- | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, EIST, Intel 64, XD bit, VT-x, VT-d, AES-NI, TSX, TXT, CLMUL, F16C, BMI1, BMI2, ABM, ADX, RdRand, vPro, TBT 2.0, TBT 3.0 |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.