PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

Intel Pentium N4200 vs Intel Celeron 6305

Intel
VS
Intel
Performance
Pentium N42008% better
2,0876% of 36,991
Celeron 6305
1,935.55% of 36,991

The Pentium N4200 has 8% better performance than the Celeron 6305 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Pentium N4200
No data available
Celeron 6305
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Pentium N4200 and the Celeron 6305 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Pentium N4200
Shop Celeron 6305
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Pentium N4200 CPU

The Intel Pentium N4200 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N4200 is compatible with Socket 1296 FCBGA motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD Graphics 505 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Pentium N4200 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 896 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 0 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Pentium N4200 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1100.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2500.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Pentium N4200 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD Graphics 505. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Pentium N4200 has the 607th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.64% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Celeron 6305 CPU

The Intel Celeron 6305 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The 6305 is compatible with FCBGA1449 motherboards and is fabricated on a 10 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron 6305 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 160 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2.5 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 4 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron 6305 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron 6305 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron 6305 has the 618th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.23% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoPentium N4200Celeron 6305
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Market SegmentMobileMobile
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Pentium N42008% better
2,0876% of 36,991
Celeron 6305
1,935.55% of 36,991

The Pentium N4200 has 8% better performance than the Celeron 6305 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Pentium N4200 is ranked 607th with a score of 2,087, and the Celeron 6305 is ranked 618th with a score of 1,935.5.

Performance per dollar
Pentium N4200
No data available
Celeron 6305
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Pentium N4200 and the Celeron 6305 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Pentium N4200 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Core i3-3217U2,111.5+1%
A6-3400M2,092+0%
Pentium N42002,087
PRO A8-9600B2,081-0%
A10 Pro-7350B2,066-1%
A6-52001,964.5-6%
Phenom II X4 N9701,940-7%
Celeron 63051,935.5-7%
Celeron N34501,925-8%
Core i3-2365M1,915-8%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Pentium N4200 orCeleron 6305
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkPentium N4200Celeron 6305
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
2,087
(+7.83%)
1,935.5
3DMark Time Spy CPU
668
--
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
163
(+1.18%)
161.1
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
52
84
(+61.54%)
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
685
1,236
(+80.44%)
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
269
744
(+176.58%)
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
2,170
(+3.88%)
2,089
CPU Mark Single-Thread
857
1,197
(+39.67%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecPentium N4200Celeron 6305
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Process Size14 nm10 nm

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecPentium N4200Celeron 6305
CodenameApollo LakeTiger Lake

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecPentium N4200Celeron 6305
Cores42
Threads42
Clock Speed1100.0 MHz1800.0 MHz
Turbo Clock2500.0 MHz--

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecPentium N4200Celeron 6305
L1 Cache896 KB160 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2.5 MB
L3 Cache0 MB4 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecPentium N4200Celeron 6305
SocketSocket 1296 FCBGAFCBGA1449
Thermal Design Power (TDP)6 W15 W
TJ Max105 °C100 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecPentium N4200Celeron 6305
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 505Intel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.