Intel Core Ultra 7 255H vs Intel Xeon W-10885M
The Core Ultra 7 255H has 16% better performance than the Xeon W-10885M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Core Ultra 7 255H and the Xeon W-10885M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Summary
About the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H CPU
The Intel Core Ultra 7 255H is a 16-core (16-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The Ultra 7 255H is compatible with FCBGA2049 motherboards and is fabricated on a 5 nm manufacturing process.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the Core Ultra 7 255H has a L3 cache with a capacity of 24 MB, providing a shared resource to the CPU's cores.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Core Ultra 7 255H features 16 total cores which can process 16 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The 16 cores consist of 6 P-Cores and 10 E-Cores. P-Cores are designed for high-performance tasks and E-Cores are intended for efficiency and lighter tasks. The base clock speed of the CPU is 4400.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 5100.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The Core Ultra 7 255H does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.
Benchmark Performance
The Core Ultra 7 255H has the 75th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 767 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 55.42% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X.
About the Intel Xeon W-10885M CPU
The Intel Xeon W-10885M is a 8-core (16-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The W-10885M is compatible with FCBGA1440 motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel Processors integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the Xeon W-10885M has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 512 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 16 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Xeon W-10885M features 8 total cores which can process 16 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2400.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 5300.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The Xeon W-10885M includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel Processors. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The Xeon W-10885M has the 112th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 767 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 47.82% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Core Ultra 7 255H | Xeon W-10885M |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
The Core Ultra 7 255H has 16% better performance than the Xeon W-10885M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The Core Ultra 7 255H is ranked 75th with a score of 21,209, and the Xeon W-10885M is ranked 112th with a score of 18,302.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Core Ultra 7 255H and the Xeon W-10885M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
| CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Core 7 240H | 21,914 | +3% |
| Core i7-12700H | 21,706 | +2% |
| Core Ultra 7 255H | 21,209 | |
| Core i9-12900HK | 21,148 | -0% |
| Ryzen 7 7840S | 20,801 | -2% |
| Ryzen 7 8745HS | 18,440 | -13% |
| Core i7-12650H | 18,363 | -13% |
| Xeon W-10885M | 18,302 | -14% |
| Ryzen 7 250 | 18,295 | -14% |
| Ryzen 9 6900HX | 17,908 | -16% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Core Ultra 7 255H | Xeon W-10885M |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 21,209 (+15.88%) | 18,302 |
| 3DMark Time Spy CPU | 11,660 (+32.32%) | 8,812 |
| Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | 2,835 (+72.87%) | 1,640 |
| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | 317 (+50.95%) | 210 |
| Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core | -- | 6,876 |
| Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core | -- | 1,533 |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | -- | 15,660 |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | -- | 2,773 |
Technical Specs
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | Core Ultra 7 255H | Xeon W-10885M |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Process Size | 5 nm | 14 nm |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | Core Ultra 7 255H | Xeon W-10885M |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | -- | Comet Lake |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | Core Ultra 7 255H | Xeon W-10885M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 16 | 8 |
| Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Performance Cores (P-cores) | 6 | -- |
| Efficient Cores (E-cores) | 10 | -- |
| Clock Speed | 4400.0 MHz | 2400.0 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | 5100.0 MHz | 5300.0 MHz |
| P-core Clock | 2.0 GHz | -- |
| P-core Turbo Clock | 5.1 GHz | -- |
| E-core Clock Speed | 1.5 GHz | -- |
| E-core Turbo Clock | 4.4 GHz | -- |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | Core Ultra 7 255H | Xeon W-10885M |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | -- | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | -- | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 16 MB |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | Core Ultra 7 255H | Xeon W-10885M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | FCBGA1440 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 W | 45 W |
| TJ Max | 110 °C | -- |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | Core Ultra 7 255H | Xeon W-10885M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | -- | Intel UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel Processors |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.