Performance
Core m7-6Y7551% better
2,678.57% of 36,991
Celeron 1000M
1,7795% of 36,991
The Core m7-6Y75 has 51% better performance than the Celeron 1000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Core m7-6Y75
6.826% of 121.53
Celeron 1000M
No data available
The Core m7-6Y75 has 6% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark: Intel Core i5-13400F.
Shop Core m7-6Y75
Shop Celeron 1000M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the Intel Core m7-6Y75 CPU
The Intel Core m7-6Y75 is an end-of-life 2-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q3 2015 with a suggested retail price of $393. It is part of Intel's Core m7 lineup, which is based on the Skylake-Y microarchitecture. The m7-6Y75 is compatible with Intel BGA 1515 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD 515 integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
The Core m7-6Y75 supports DDR3 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the Core m7-6Y75 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 256 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 4 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Core m7-6Y75 features 2 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1200.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 3.1 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The Core m7-6Y75 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD 515. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The Core m7-6Y75 has the 551st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 7.24% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Its 2,678.5 score and $393 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 6.82. This is the 211th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Perf. Physics benchmark.
About the Intel Celeron 1000M CPU
The Intel Celeron 1000M is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q1 2013. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Ivy Bridge microarchitecture. The 1000M is compatible with Intel Socket G2 (988B) motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
The Celeron 1000M supports DDR3 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the Celeron 1000M has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 256 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 2 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Celeron 1000M features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The Celeron 1000M includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The Celeron 1000M has the 638th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.81% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Core m7-6Y75 | Celeron 1000M |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Series | Core m7 | Celeron |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q3 2015 | Q1 2013 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $393 | -- |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Core m7-6Y7551% better
2,678.57% of 36,991
Celeron 1000M
1,7795% of 36,991
The Core m7-6Y75 has 51% better performance than the Celeron 1000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The Core m7-6Y75 is ranked 551st with a score of 2,678.5, and the Celeron 1000M is ranked 638th with a score of 1,779.
Performance per dollar
Core m7-6Y75
6.826% of 121.53
Celeron 1000M
No data available
The Core m7-6Y75 has 13% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
Core m7-6Y75's 6.82 performance per dollar ranks it 211th among the other benchmarked CPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline CPU:Core m7-6Y75 or
| CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Core m3-6Y30 | 2,704 | +1% |
| Core m5-6Y57 | 2,681 | +0% |
| Core m7-6Y75 | 2,678.5 | |
| Pentium Silver N5000 | 2,619 | -2% |
| Core m5-6Y54 | 2,529 | -6% |
| Pentium 3558U | 1,787 | -33% |
| Pentium 2127U | 1,782 | -33% |
| Celeron 1000M | 1,779 | -34% |
| Pentium N3700 | 1,768 | -34% |
| Pentium 3556U | 1,756 | -34% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline CPU:Core m7-6Y75 orCeleron 1000M
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| Core i7-840QM | 8.25 | +21% |
| Core i7-5550U | 8.15 | +20% |
| Core i7-2960XM | 7.39 | +8% |
| Core i7-820QM | 7.33 | +8% |
| Core i7-2920XM | 7.22 | +6% |
| Core m7-6Y75 | 6.82 | |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Core m7-6Y75 | Celeron 1000M |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 2,678.5 (+50.56%) | 1,779 |
| Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | 205 | -- |
| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | 102 | -- |
| Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core | -- | 508 |
| Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core | -- | 297 |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 2,312 (+115.07%) | 1,075 |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | 1,348 (+38.11%) | 976 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | Core m7-6Y75 | Celeron 1000M |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Foundry | Intel | Intel |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Transistors | -- | 1,400 million |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | Core m7-6Y75 | Celeron 1000M |
|---|---|---|
| Series | Core m7 | Celeron |
| Microarchitecture | Skylake-Y | Ivy Bridge |
| Codename | Skylake-Y | Ivy Bridge |
| Memory Support | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Memory Channels | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |
| ECC Memory | No | No |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | Core m7-6Y75 | Celeron 1000M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 2 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Clock Speed | 1200.0 MHz | 1800.0 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | 3.1 GHz | -- |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 12.0x | 18.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | Core m7-6Y75 | Celeron 1000M |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 2 MB |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | Core m7-6Y75 | Celeron 1000M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | Intel BGA 1515 | Intel Socket G2 (988B) |
| PCI Express | PCIe 3.0 x10 | -- |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 W | 35 W |
| Tcase Max | -- | 105 °C |
| TJ Max | 100 °C | 105 °C |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | Core m7-6Y75 | Celeron 1000M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 515 | Intel HD |
| Extensions / Technologies | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, EIST, HTT, Intel 64, XD bit, VT-x, VT-d, EPT, AES-NI, TSX, TXT, CLMUL, FMA3, Boost 2.0 | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, EIST, 64-bit, XD bit, VT-x, Smart Cache |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.