Intel Core m3-8100Y vs AMD E1-6010

VS
Performance
Core m3-8100Y281% better
2,579.57% of 36,991
E1-6010
677.52% of 36,991

The Core m3-8100Y has 281% better performance than the E1-6010 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Core m3-8100Y
No data available
E1-6010
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Core m3-8100Y and the E1-6010 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Core m3-8100Y
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Core m3-8100Y CPU

The Intel Core m3-8100Y is a 2-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The m3-8100Y is compatible with FCBGA1515 motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Core m3-8100Y has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 4 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Core m3-8100Y features 2 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1100.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 3400.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Core m3-8100Y does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.

Benchmark Performance

The Core m3-8100Y has the 562nd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 6.97% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD E1-6010 CPU

The AMD E1-6010 is an end-of-life 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2014. It is part of AMD's E1 lineup, which is based on the Beema microarchitecture. The E1-6010 is compatible with AMD Socket FT3 motherboards and is fabricated on GlobalFoundries's 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R2 Graphics integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The E1-6010 supports DDR3 memory and features a single-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 1 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the E1-6010 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The E1-6010 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1350.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The E1-6010 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R2 Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The E1-6010 has the 710th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 1.83% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCore m3-8100YE1-6010
ManufacturerIntelAMD
Series--E1
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release Date--Q2 2014
Production Status--End-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Core m3-8100Y281% better
2,579.57% of 36,991
E1-6010
677.52% of 36,991

The Core m3-8100Y has 281% better performance than the E1-6010 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Core m3-8100Y is ranked 562nd with a score of 2,579.5, and the E1-6010 is ranked 710th with a score of 677.5.

Performance per dollar
Core m3-8100Y
No data available
E1-6010
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Core m3-8100Y and the E1-6010 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Core m3-8100Y or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Core i5-460M2,587+0%
Core i5-4302Y2,583+0%
Core m3-8100Y2,579.5
Core i3-4030U2,558-1%
Core m5-6Y542,529-2%
E1-2500717.5-72%
E-450703-73%
E1-6010677.5-74%
Celeron N2805637.5-75%
E-350609-76%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Core m3-8100Y orE1-6010
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCore m3-8100YE1-6010
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
2,579.5
(+280.74%)
677.5
3DMark Time Spy CPU
992
--
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
179.5
(+266.33%)
49
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
96.6
(+286.4%)
25
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
--
218
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
--
126
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
2,881
(+440.53%)
533
CPU Mark Single-Thread
1,742
(+309.88%)
425
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCore m3-8100YE1-6010
ManufacturerIntelAMD
Foundry--GlobalFoundries
Process Size14 nm28 nm

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCore m3-8100YE1-6010
Series--E1
Microarchitecture--Beema
Codename--Beema
Memory Support--DDR3
Memory Channels--Single-channel
ECC Memory--No

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCore m3-8100YE1-6010
Cores22
Threads42
Clock Speed1100.0 MHz1350.0 MHz
Turbo Clock3400.0 MHz--
Base Clock--100 MHz
Multiplier--13.5x
Multiplier Unlocked--No

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCore m3-8100YE1-6010
L1 Cache128 KB64 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB--

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCore m3-8100YE1-6010
SocketFCBGA1515AMD Socket FT3
PCI Express--PCIe 2.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)5 W10 W
Tcase Max--90 °C
TJ Max100 °C--

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCore m3-8100YE1-6010
Integrated Graphics--Radeon R2 Graphics
Extensions / Technologies--MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AES, F16C, BMI1, AMD64, CnQ, NX bit, AMD-V

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.