Intel Core M-5Y51 vs Intel Celeron 2970M

VS
Performance
Core M-5Y51
2,1226% of 36,991
Celeron 2970M7% better
2,272.56% of 36,991

The Celeron 2970M has 7% better performance than the Core M-5Y51 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Core M-5Y51
No data available
Celeron 2970M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Core M-5Y51 and the Celeron 2970M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Core M-5Y51
Shop Celeron 2970M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Core M-5Y51 CPU

The Intel Core M-5Y51 is a 2-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q4 2014. It is part of Intel's Core M lineup, which is based on the Broadwell-Y microarchitecture. The M-5Y51 is compatible with Intel BGA 1234 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD 5300 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The Core M-5Y51 supports DDR4 memory. In terms of cache, the Core M-5Y51 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 256 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 4 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Core M-5Y51 features 2 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1100.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2.6 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The Core M-5Y51 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD 5300. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Core M-5Y51 has the 605th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.74% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Celeron 2970M CPU

The Intel Celeron 2970M is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The 2970M is compatible with FCPGA946 motherboards and is fabricated on a 22 nm manufacturing process.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron 2970M has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 2 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron 2970M features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2200.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron 2970M does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron 2970M has the 589th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 6.14% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCore M-5Y51Celeron 2970M
ManufacturerIntelIntel
SeriesCore M--
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ4 2014--
Production StatusActive--
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Core M-5Y51
2,1226% of 36,991
Celeron 2970M7% better
2,272.56% of 36,991

The Celeron 2970M has 7% better performance than the Core M-5Y51 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Core M-5Y51 is ranked 605th with a score of 2,122, and the Celeron 2970M is ranked 589th with a score of 2,272.5.

Performance per dollar
Core M-5Y51
No data available
Celeron 2970M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Core M-5Y51 and the Celeron 2970M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Core M-5Y51 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Core M-5Y10c2,311+9%
PRO A12-9800B2,275+7%
Celeron 2970M2,272.5+7%
A8-3500M2,247+6%
A8-4500M2,243+6%
Pentium B9602,139+1%
Pro A10-8700B2,123.5+0%
Core M-5Y512,122
Core i3-3217U2,111.5-0%
A6-3400M2,092-1%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Core M-5Y51 orCeleron 2970M
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCore M-5Y51Celeron 2970M
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
2,122
2,272.5
(+7.09%)
3DMark Time Spy CPU
--
900
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
152
164
(+7.89%)
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
84
85
(+1.19%)
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
1,145
--
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
677
--
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
2,014
(+34.18%)
1,501
CPU Mark Single-Thread
1,310
(+5.22%)
1,245
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCore M-5Y51Celeron 2970M
ManufacturerIntelIntel
FoundryIntel--
Process Size14 nm22 nm
Transistors1,300 million960 million

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCore M-5Y51Celeron 2970M
SeriesCore M--
MicroarchitectureBroadwell-Y--
CodenameBroadwell-Y--
Memory SupportDDR4--
ECC MemoryNo--

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCore M-5Y51Celeron 2970M
Cores22
Threads42
Clock Speed1100.0 MHz2200.0 MHz
Turbo Clock2.6 GHz--
Base Clock100 MHz--
Multiplier11.0x--
Multiplier UnlockedNo--

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCore M-5Y51Celeron 2970M
L1 Cache64 KB128 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB
L3 Cache4 MB2 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCore M-5Y51Celeron 2970M
SocketIntel BGA 1234FCPGA946
Thermal Design Power (TDP)5 W37 W
TJ Max95 °C100 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCore M-5Y51Celeron 2970M
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 5300--
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.2, AVX, EIST, Intel 64, XD bit, VT-x, HTT--

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.