Intel Core i7-6567U vs Intel Celeron N4500

VS
Performance
Core i7-6567U248% better
5,25114% of 36,991
Celeron N4500
1,5074% of 36,991

The Core i7-6567U has 248% better performance than the Celeron N4500 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Core i7-6567U
No data available
Celeron N4500
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Core i7-6567U and the Celeron N4500 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Core i7-6567U
Shop Celeron N4500
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Core i7-6567U CPU

The Intel Core i7-6567U is a 2-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The i7-6567U is compatible with FCBGA1356 motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel Iris Graphics 550 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Core i7-6567U has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 4 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Core i7-6567U features 2 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 3300.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 3600.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Core i7-6567U includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel Iris Graphics 550. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i7-6567U has the 401st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 14.20% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Celeron N4500 CPU

The Intel Celeron N4500 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N4500 is compatible with FCBGA1338 motherboards and is fabricated on a 10 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel UHD Graphics integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron N4500 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 4,096 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1.5 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 4 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N4500 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1100.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2800.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N4500 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel UHD Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N4500 has the 667th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.07% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCore i7-6567UCeleron N4500
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Market SegmentMobileMobile
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Core i7-6567U248% better
5,25114% of 36,991
Celeron N4500
1,5074% of 36,991

The Core i7-6567U has 248% better performance than the Celeron N4500 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Core i7-6567U is ranked 401st with a score of 5,251, and the Celeron N4500 is ranked 667th with a score of 1,507.

Performance per dollar
Core i7-6567U
No data available
Celeron N4500
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Core i7-6567U and the Celeron N4500 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Core i7-6567U or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U5,408+3%
Pentium Gold 75055,285+1%
Core i7-6567U5,251
Core i7-7660U5,230-0%
Ryzen 3 2300U5,191-1%
Celeron 2957U1,524-71%
Celeron N31501,516-71%
Celeron N45001,507-71%
Atom x7-Z87501,499-71%
A9-94101,470-72%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Core i7-6567U orCeleron N4500
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCore i7-6567UCeleron N4500
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
5,251
(+248.44%)
1,507
3DMark Time Spy CPU
2,078
(+312.3%)
504
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
359.5
(+110.23%)
171
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
143.6
(+75.12%)
82
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
2,387
(+260.57%)
662
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
1,147
(+150.98%)
457
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
3,722
(+86.47%)
1,996
CPU Mark Single-Thread
2,066
(+48.85%)
1,388
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCore i7-6567UCeleron N4500
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Process Size14 nm10 nm

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCore i7-6567UCeleron N4500
CodenameSkylakeJasper Lake

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCore i7-6567UCeleron N4500
Cores22
Threads42
Clock Speed3300.0 MHz1100.0 MHz
Turbo Clock3600.0 MHz2800.0 MHz

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCore i7-6567UCeleron N4500
L1 Cache128 KB4,096 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCore i7-6567UCeleron N4500
SocketFCBGA1356FCBGA1338
Thermal Design Power (TDP)28 W6 W
TJ Max100 °C105 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCore i7-6567UCeleron N4500
Integrated GraphicsIntel Iris Graphics 550Intel UHD Graphics

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.