Intel Core i7-4940MX vs Intel Celeron 3865U
The Core i7-4940MX has 393% better performance than the Celeron 3865U for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The Celeron 3865U has 108% better value for the money than the Core i7-4940MX for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Summary
About the Intel Core i7-4940MX CPU
The Intel Core i7-4940MX is an end-of-life 4-core (8-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q1 2014 with a suggested retail price of $1,096. It is part of Intel's Core i7 Extreme lineup, which is based on the Haswell microarchitecture. The i7-4940MX is compatible with Intel Socket G3 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD 4600 integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
The Core i7-4940MX supports DDR3 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the Core i7-4940MX has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 256 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 8 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Core i7-4940MX features 4 total cores which can process 8 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 3.1 GHz, and it can boost up to 4.0 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is unlocked, enabling overclocking for those seeking to push the CPU's performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The Core i7-4940MX includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD 4600. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The Core i7-4940MX has the 263rd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 25.42% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Its 9,402 score and $1,096 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 8.58. This is the 203rd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Perf. Physics benchmark.
About the Intel Celeron 3865U CPU
The Intel Celeron 3865U is an end-of-life 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q1 2017 with a suggested retail price of $107. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Kaby Lake-U microarchitecture. The 3865U is compatible with Intel BGA 1356 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD Graphics 610 integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
The Celeron 3865U supports DDR4-2133, DDR3 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the Celeron 3865U has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 256 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 2 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Celeron 3865U features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The Celeron 3865U includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD Graphics 610. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The Celeron 3865U has the 622nd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.15% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Its 1,906 score and $107 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 17.81. This is the 166th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Perf. Physics benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Core i7-4940MX | Celeron 3865U |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Series | Core i7 Extreme | Celeron |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q1 2014 | Q1 2017 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $1,096 | $107 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
The Core i7-4940MX has 393% better performance than the Celeron 3865U for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The Core i7-4940MX is ranked 263rd with a score of 9,402, and the Celeron 3865U is ranked 622nd with a score of 1,906.
The Celeron 3865U has 108% better value for the money than the Core i7-4940MX for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The Core i7-4940MX is ranked 203rd with a performance per dollar of 8.58, and the Celeron 3865U is ranked 166th with a performance per dollar of 17.81.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
| CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Xeon E3-1535M v5 | 9,866 | +5% |
| Core i5-1135G7 | 9,456 | +1% |
| Core i5-1038NG7 | 9,402 | 0% |
| Core i7-4940MX | 9,402 | |
| Xeon E3-1505M v5 | 9,332 | -1% |
| Pentium Silver N5000 | 2,619 | -72% |
| Core m5-6Y54 | 2,529 | -73% |
| Celeron 3865U | 1,906 | -80% |
| Celeron J4005 | 1,877 | -80% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| Core i7-4712HQ | 18.49 | +116% |
| Core i7-3630QM | 18.4 | +114% |
| Celeron 3865U | 17.81 | +108% |
| Celeron J4005 | 17.54 | +104% |
| Core i7-4702MQ | 16.62 | +94% |
| Core i7-4910MQ | 15.27 | +78% |
| Core i7-4900MQ | 14.89 | +74% |
| Core i7-4940MX | 8.58 | |
| Core i7-4930MX | 7.96 | -7% |
| Core i7-2960XM | 7.39 | -14% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Core i7-4940MX | Celeron 3865U |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 9,402 (+393.28%) | 1,906 |
| Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | 708 (+398.59%) | 142 |
| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | 157 (+118.06%) | 72 |
| Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core | 4,198 (+505.77%) | 693 |
| Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core | 1,288 (+227.74%) | 393 |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 7,044 (+433.64%) | 1,320 |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | 2,243 (+116.71%) | 1,035 |
Technical Specs
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | Core i7-4940MX | Celeron 3865U |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Foundry | Intel | Intel |
| Process Size | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Transistors | 1,400 million | -- |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | Core i7-4940MX | Celeron 3865U |
|---|---|---|
| Series | Core i7 Extreme | Celeron |
| Microarchitecture | Haswell | Kaby Lake-U |
| Codename | Haswell | Kaby Lake-U |
| Memory Support | DDR3 | DDR4-2133, DDR3 |
| Memory Channels | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |
| ECC Memory | No | No |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | Core i7-4940MX | Celeron 3865U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz | 1800.0 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | 4.0 GHz | -- |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 31.0x | 18.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | Core i7-4940MX | Celeron 3865U |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 2 MB |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | Core i7-4940MX | Celeron 3865U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | Intel Socket G3 | Intel BGA 1356 |
| PCI Express | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x10 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 57 W | 15 W |
| Tcase Max | 100 °C | -- |
| TJ Max | 100 °C | 100 °C |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | Core i7-4940MX | Celeron 3865U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 | Intel HD Graphics 610 |
| Extensions / Technologies | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, EIST, Intel 64, XD bit, VT-x, HTT, AES-NI, TXT, TSX, CLMUL, FMA3 | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.2, EIST, Intel 64, XD bit, VT-x, VT-d, AES-NI |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.