Intel Core i5-6267U vs Intel Celeron N5105

VS
Performance
Core i5-6267U6% better
4,678.513% of 36,991
Celeron N5105
4,39412% of 36,991

The Core i5-6267U has 6% better performance than the Celeron N5105 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Core i5-6267U
No data available
Celeron N5105
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Core i5-6267U and the Celeron N5105 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Core i5-6267U
Shop Celeron N5105
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Core i5-6267U CPU

The Intel Core i5-6267U is a 2-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The i5-6267U is compatible with FCBGA1356 motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel Iris Graphics 550 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Core i5-6267U has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 4 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Core i5-6267U features 2 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2900.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 3300.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Core i5-6267U includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel Iris Graphics 550. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i5-6267U has the 414th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 12.65% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Celeron N5105 CPU

The Intel Celeron N5105 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N5105 is compatible with FCBGA1338 motherboards and is fabricated on a 10 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel UHD Graphics integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron N5105 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 256 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1.5 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 4 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N5105 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2000.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2900.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N5105 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel UHD Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N5105 has the 428th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 11.88% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCore i5-6267UCeleron N5105
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Market SegmentMobileMobile
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Core i5-6267U6% better
4,678.513% of 36,991
Celeron N5105
4,39412% of 36,991

The Core i5-6267U has 6% better performance than the Celeron N5105 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Core i5-6267U is ranked 414th with a score of 4,678.5, and the Celeron N5105 is ranked 428th with a score of 4,394.

Performance per dollar
Core i5-6267U
No data available
Celeron N5105
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Core i5-6267U and the Celeron N5105 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Core i5-6267U or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Core i7-7560U4,693+0%
Core i7-840QM4,686+0%
Core i5-6267U4,678.5
Core i7-3540M4,627-1%
Core i7-6600U4,606.5-2%
Core i5-6260U4,420-6%
Core i7-6560U4,399-6%
Celeron N51054,394-6%
Core i5-7300U4,364.5-7%
Pentium Silver N60054,341.5-7%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Core i5-6267U orCeleron N5105
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCore i5-6267UCeleron N5105
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
4,678.5
(+6.47%)
4,394
3DMark Time Spy CPU
1,952
(+18.81%)
1,643
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
330
368
(+11.52%)
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
131
(+21.18%)
108.1
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
2,143
(+66%)
1,291
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
1,018
(+116.14%)
471
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
3,432
4,066
(+18.47%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
1,870
(+23.35%)
1,516
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCore i5-6267UCeleron N5105
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Process Size14 nm10 nm

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCore i5-6267UCeleron N5105
CodenameSkylakeJasper Lake

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCore i5-6267UCeleron N5105
Cores24
Threads44
Clock Speed2900.0 MHz2000.0 MHz
Turbo Clock3300.0 MHz2900.0 MHz

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCore i5-6267UCeleron N5105
L1 Cache128 KB256 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCore i5-6267UCeleron N5105
SocketFCBGA1356FCBGA1338
Thermal Design Power (TDP)28 W10 W
TJ Max100 °C105 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCore i5-6267UCeleron N5105
Integrated GraphicsIntel Iris Graphics 550Intel UHD Graphics

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.