Intel Core i5-4200H vs Intel Celeron N5105

VS
Performance
Core i5-4200H
4,03111% of 36,991
Celeron N51059% better
4,39412% of 36,991

The Celeron N5105 has 9% better performance than the Core i5-4200H for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Core i5-4200H
No data available
Celeron N5105
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Core i5-4200H and the Celeron N5105 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Core i5-4200H
Shop Celeron N5105
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Core i5-4200H CPU

The Intel Core i5-4200H is a 2-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The i5-4200H is compatible with FCBGA1364 motherboards and is fabricated on a 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD Graphics 4600 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Core i5-4200H has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 3 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Core i5-4200H features 2 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2800.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 3400.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Core i5-4200H includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD Graphics 4600. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i5-4200H has the 449th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 10.90% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Celeron N5105 CPU

The Intel Celeron N5105 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N5105 is compatible with FCBGA1338 motherboards and is fabricated on a 10 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel UHD Graphics integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron N5105 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 256 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1.5 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 4 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N5105 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2000.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2900.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N5105 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel UHD Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N5105 has the 428th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 11.88% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCore i5-4200HCeleron N5105
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Market SegmentMobileMobile
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Core i5-4200H
4,03111% of 36,991
Celeron N51059% better
4,39412% of 36,991

The Celeron N5105 has 9% better performance than the Core i5-4200H for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Core i5-4200H is ranked 449th with a score of 4,031, and the Celeron N5105 is ranked 428th with a score of 4,394.

Performance per dollar
Core i5-4200H
No data available
Celeron N5105
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Core i5-4200H and the Celeron N5105 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Core i5-4200H or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Core i5-6260U4,420+10%
Core i7-6560U4,399+9%
Celeron N51054,394+9%
Core i5-7300U4,364.5+8%
Pentium Silver N60054,341.5+8%
Core i7-2620M4,060+1%
Core i7-4558U4,037+0%
Core i5-4200H4,031
Core i5-1030NG74,023-0%
Core i7-5500U4,008-1%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Core i5-4200H orCeleron N5105
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCore i5-4200HCeleron N5105
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
4,031
4,394
(+9.01%)
3DMark Time Spy CPU
--
1,643
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
323.5
368
(+13.76%)
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
129.5
(+19.8%)
108.1
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
1,840
(+42.53%)
1,291
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
932
(+97.88%)
471
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
3,108
4,066
(+30.82%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
1,786
(+17.81%)
1,516
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCore i5-4200HCeleron N5105
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Process Size22 nm10 nm
Transistors960 million--

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCore i5-4200HCeleron N5105
CodenameHaswellJasper Lake

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCore i5-4200HCeleron N5105
Cores24
Threads44
Clock Speed2800.0 MHz2000.0 MHz
Turbo Clock3400.0 MHz2900.0 MHz

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCore i5-4200HCeleron N5105
L1 Cache128 KB256 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1.5 MB
L3 Cache3 MB4 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCore i5-4200HCeleron N5105
SocketFCBGA1364FCBGA1338
Thermal Design Power (TDP)47 W10 W
TJ Max100 °C105 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCore i5-4200HCeleron N5105
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 4600Intel UHD Graphics

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.