Intel Core i3-4030U vs AMD C-60

VS
Performance
Core i3-4030U375% better
2,5587% of 36,991
C-60
5381% of 36,991

The Core i3-4030U has 375% better performance than the C-60 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Core i3-4030U
No data available
C-60
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Core i3-4030U and the C-60 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Core i3-4030U
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Core i3-4030U CPU

The Intel Core i3-4030U is a 2-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The i3-4030U is compatible with FCBGA1168 motherboards and is fabricated on a 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD Graphics 4400 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Core i3-4030U has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 3 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Core i3-4030U features 2 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1900.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Core i3-4030U includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD Graphics 4400. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i3-4030U has the 563rd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 6.92% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD C-60 CPU

The AMD C-60 is an end-of-life 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q3 2011. It is part of AMD's C lineup, which is based on the Ontario microarchitecture. The C-60 is compatible with AMD Socket FT1 motherboards and is fabricated on a 40 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 6290 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The C-60 supports DDR3 memory and features a single-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 1 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the C-60 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The C-60 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1000.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 1333.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The C-60 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon HD 6290. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The C-60 has the 717th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 1.45% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCore i3-4030UC-60
ManufacturerIntelAMD
Series--C
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release Date--Q3 2011
Production Status--End-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Core i3-4030U375% better
2,5587% of 36,991
C-60
5381% of 36,991

The Core i3-4030U has 375% better performance than the C-60 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Core i3-4030U is ranked 563rd with a score of 2,558, and the C-60 is ranked 717th with a score of 538.

Performance per dollar
Core i3-4030U
No data available
C-60
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Core i3-4030U and the C-60 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Core i3-4030U or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Core i5-4302Y2,583+1%
Core m3-8100Y2,579.5+1%
Core i3-4030U2,558
Core m5-6Y542,529-1%
A12-9700P2,527-1%
E1-2100589-77%
A4-1200570-78%
C-60538-79%
A6-9220e529-79%
C-70517-80%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Core i3-4030U orC-60
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCore i3-4030UC-60
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
2,558
(+375.46%)
538
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
191
--
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
70
--
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
1,155
(+650%)
154
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
565
(+520.88%)
91
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,875
(+546.55%)
290
CPU Mark Single-Thread
1,026
(+189.83%)
354
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCore i3-4030UC-60
ManufacturerIntelAMD
Process Size22 nm40 nm

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCore i3-4030UC-60
Series--C
Microarchitecture--Ontario
CodenameHaswellOntario
Memory Support--DDR3
Memory Channels--Single-channel
ECC Memory--No

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCore i3-4030UC-60
Cores22
Threads42
Clock Speed1900.0 MHz1000.0 MHz
Turbo Clock--1333.0 MHz
Base Clock--100 MHz
Multiplier--10.0x
Multiplier Unlocked--No

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCore i3-4030UC-60
L1 Cache128 KB64 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache3 MB--

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCore i3-4030UC-60
SocketFCBGA1168AMD Socket FT1
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W9 W
TJ Max100 °C--

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCore i3-4030UC-60
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 4400Radeon HD 6290
Extensions / Technologies--MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.