PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

Intel Core i3-4012Y vs AMD A10-7300

Intel
VS
AMD
Performance
Core i3-4012Y8% better
2,1596% of 36,991
A10-7300
2,000.55% of 36,991

The Core i3-4012Y has 8% better performance than the A10-7300 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Core i3-4012Y
No data available
A10-7300
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Core i3-4012Y and the A10-7300 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Core i3-4012Y
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Core i3-4012Y CPU

The Intel Core i3-4012Y is a 2-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The i3-4012Y is compatible with FCBGA1168 motherboards and is fabricated on a 22 nm manufacturing process.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Core i3-4012Y has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 3 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Core i3-4012Y features 2 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1500.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Core i3-4012Y does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i3-4012Y has the 598th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.84% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD A10-7300 CPU

The AMD A10-7300 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2014. It is part of AMD's A10 lineup, which is based on the Steamroller microarchitecture. The A10-7300 is compatible with AMD Socket FP3 motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R6 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The A10-7300 supports DDR3-1600 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the A10-7300 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 256 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 4 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A10-7300 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1.9 GHz, and it can boost up to 3.2 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The A10-7300 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R6. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A10-7300 has the 613th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.41% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCore i3-4012YA10-7300
ManufacturerIntelAMD
Series--A10
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release Date--Q2 2014
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Core i3-4012Y8% better
2,1596% of 36,991
A10-7300
2,000.55% of 36,991

The Core i3-4012Y has 8% better performance than the A10-7300 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Core i3-4012Y is ranked 598th with a score of 2,159, and the A10-7300 is ranked 613th with a score of 2,000.5.

Performance per dollar
Core i3-4012Y
No data available
A10-7300
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Core i3-4012Y and the A10-7300 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Core i3-4012Y or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Core i3-3227U2,195.5+2%
Core M-5Y102,171+1%
Pentium 2020M2,1590%
Core i3-4012Y2,159
A10-5745M2,155-0%
Core i5-4210Y2,047-5%
Pro A8-8600B2,034-6%
A10-73002,000.5-7%
Pentium B9701,989-8%
A6-52001,964.5-9%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Core i3-4012Y orA10-7300
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCore i3-4012YA10-7300
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
2,159
(+7.92%)
2,000.5
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
150
158
(+5.33%)
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
60
(+3.45%)
58
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
--
627
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
--
284
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,260
1,739
(+38.02%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
711
861
(+21.1%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCore i3-4012YA10-7300
ManufacturerIntelAMD
Process Size22 nm28 nm
Transistors--2,410 million

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCore i3-4012YA10-7300
Series--A10
Microarchitecture--Steamroller
Codename--Kaveri
Memory Support--DDR3-1600
Memory Channels--Dual-channel
ECC Memory--No

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCore i3-4012YA10-7300
Cores24
Threads44
Clock Speed1500.0 MHz1.9 GHz
Turbo Clock--3.2 GHz
Base Clock--100 MHz
Multiplier--19.0x
Multiplier Unlocked--No

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCore i3-4012YA10-7300
L1 Cache128 KB256 KB
L2 Cache512 KB4 MB
L3 Cache3 MB--

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCore i3-4012YA10-7300
SocketFCBGA1168AMD Socket FP3
PCI Express--PCIe 3.0
Thermal Design Power (TDP)11.5 W20 W
TJ Max100 °C--

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCore i3-4012YA10-7300
Integrated Graphics--Radeon R6
Extensions / Technologies--MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4, SSE4a, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, FMA3, FMA4, TBM, XOP, AMD64, AMD-V, Turbo Core

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.